It depends on what you mean by broken. If you're asking if any laws of nature have been completely debunked, then no, the laws of nature remain true for the general case. On the other hand, there are certain situations in physics, usually when dealing in theoretical physics, where the laws of physics do not hold true.
The laws of nature are fundamental principles that describe the behavior of the universe, and as far as we know, they have not been broken. Any event that appears to violate these laws may suggest our understanding is incomplete or that there are unknown factors at play.
Actually, there are some laws that have never been broken. Generally, these laws are those that are relatively "out there". For example, Oklahoma has a law that says that it is illegal for people to hunt whales in Oklahoma. Obviously, it's a little difficult for any person in Oklahoma to hunt whales.
Newton's Laws are important because they ae the foundation of modern Physics. Newton's Laws describe Laws that are true throughout the Universe. Newton's laws introduced mathematical models and tools to describe nature.
Causal laws are principles that describe the relationship between causes and effects in the physical world. The uniformity of nature is the idea that these causal laws operate consistently and predictably across time and space. The belief in the uniformity of nature forms the basis for scientific inquiry and our understanding of the natural world.
Darius has not gone down in history as a lawmaker. But Persia during his reign had a system of laws based on Hammurabi's earlier Mesopotamian code, that had "King's laws" that were valid for the whole nation next to local laws and customs. The only set of laws that Darius ever ordered was a codification of the laws of Egypt. The basis here remained the ancient Egyptian laws and customs themselves that for the most part had never been properly codified.
Laws differ from theories because laws describe observed patterns in nature or society, based on empirical evidence, while theories provide explanations and interpretations of these patterns. Laws do not provide the underlying mechanisms or reasons why these patterns exist, which is the function of a theory.
Something which is not biologically possible/ unnatural IE, Men can not give birth to babies because this is not in accord(ance) with the law of nature.
No one has ever been charged with breaking any specific laws or acts.
The laws of the government of Great Britain can be broken, but it is totally impossible to break the laws of nature.
Since shortly after the moment of Creation (Big Bang, or by God), there is no evidence that the laws of nature and science have ever changed.
The Supreme Court
judicial branch
I want to make sure the self storage I am considering is safe.Is there a licence they have to have for this?What about laws requiring if their facilities have ever been broken into?
You can't control the laws of nature. The laws of nature control you.
The duration of Broken Laws is 1.17 hours.
No laws have been broken. However there has been a breach of confidentiality which could be challenged as a civil matter.
Broken Laws was created on 1924-11-09.
Because they had committed crimes. The laws that they had broken may have been ridiculous, or what we would retrospectivly call illegal, but they would have been the laws of the time.
As of this time, there are no sentient robots, meaning that there are no robots that are capable of truly independent activity. Modern robots are only capable of performing specific tasks for which they have been programmed.