The reconstruction plan after the Civil War varied in its impact on freed slaves. While it brought some short-term gains like the end of slavery and citizenship rights, the lack of economic support and continued discrimination hindered their full integration into society. Freed slaves faced challenges such as segregation, limited opportunities, and violence, leading to a prolonged struggle for equality.
The Congressional plan of Reconstruction of 1867, also known as the Reconstruction Act of 1867, divided the South into military districts, required Southern states to ratify the 14th Amendment, and establish new state governments with black male suffrage. It also sought to protect the civil rights of freed slaves and ensure their participation in government.
Runaway slaves needed a plan, help from allies or a network (such as the Underground Railroad), knowledge of the terrain, disguises, forged papers or passes, and determination to navigate obstacles and evade capture.
Slaves would have needed organization, communication, and a clear plan in order to successfully rebel. They would have needed to overcome physical and mental barriers, such as fear, and have a shared goal or motivation to unite them in their uprising.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.
It help because the black codes freed slaves and president johnsons reconstruction plan wasnt that powerful than black codes.Official Answer
Radical Republicans wanted equal rights for freedmen (freed black slaves), and they also wanted a tougher stance against the South.
The plan to return freed slaves to Africa was called Back-to-Africa movement.
Lincoln had several goals that he wanted to accomplish with Reconstruction. He wanted to rebuild the South's economy, homes, and bring the country back together. He also wished to help the newly freed slaves. The popular phrase for this assistance for these slaves was "forty acres and a mule," and it was highly resented by white people.
A major difference between Johnson's Reconstruction plan and Congress' plan was their approach to granting political rights to freed slaves. Johnson's plan mainly focused on restoring political power to former Confederate leaders, while Congress' plan, known as Radical Reconstruction, aimed at protecting the civil and political rights of freed slaves through legislation like the Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment. Additionally, Congress' plan was much more aggressive in terms of government intervention in the Southern states than Johnson's more lenient and forgiving approach.
They wanted to have their own government and make policies that dealt with newly freed slaves.
Congress passed a reconstruction plan after the American Civil War to address the issues of rebuilding the Southern states and reintegrating them into the Union. The plan aimed to ensure civil rights for newly freed slaves and establish a new order in the South. It also sought to prevent future secession and secure a lasting peace.
The reconstruction plan that was effectively killed by a pocket veto was the Congressional Reconstruction plan of 1867, specifically the Reconstruction Act of 1867. President Andrew Johnson, who opposed many aspects of the plan, did not sign it into law and instead allowed it to expire by taking no action within the 10-day window, effectively preventing its implementation. This act aimed to establish military governance in the South and ensure civil rights for freed slaves, but Johnson's inaction stymied these efforts. The pocket veto exemplified the ongoing conflict between Johnson and Congress over the direction of Reconstruction.
President Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Abraham Lincoln, initially supported a lenient approach to Reconstruction but faced opposition from Radical Republicans in Congress. The Radical Reconstruction plan, which aimed to impose stricter measures on the Southern states and ensure civil rights for freed slaves, was largely driven by Congress rather than Johnson himself. Ultimately, his resistance to the Radical Reconstruction efforts led to his impeachment in 1868.
Andrew Johnson's group had the harshest reconstruction plan after the Civil War. This did not include any protection for people who had been slaves.
The Radical Republicans were a faction within the Republican Party during the Reconstruction era, advocating for harsh penalties on the Southern states and strong protections for the rights of freed slaves. Their plan for Reconstruction emphasized civil rights, the redistribution of land, and the military oversight of the South to ensure compliance with federal laws. In contrast, President Andrew Johnson's plan was more lenient, focusing on quickly restoring Southern states to the Union with minimal requirements and without strong protections for the newly freed African Americans, leading to significant conflicts between the two factions.
Comparing the presidential plan and the Congressional plan for Reconstruction, one would likely conclude that the Congressional plan was more stringent and aimed at ensuring civil rights for freed slaves. The presidential plan, primarily advocated by President Andrew Johnson, favored quicker reintegration of Southern states with lenient terms, while the Congressional plan sought to impose stricter requirements and protections for newly freed African Americans. Ultimately, the Congressional approach reflected a stronger commitment to civil rights and a desire to reshape Southern society, contrasting sharply with the more conciliatory stance of the presidential plan.