Well we need more information....if you are merging onto the freeway then it is the car already in the lane.....if you are at a stop sign then it is the car on the right.
the person that gets there first has the right of way
no. when it comes to the right-of-way traffic regulations, the reality is the law gives no driver the right-of-way. traffic regulations only state who must yield the right-of-way.
Yes, it certainly does. You need to check your state laws to determine the law in your jurisdiction.
It is not a law - it is a motor vehicle RULE or REGULATION. Two cars approaching an un-marked intersection - the car to the right should be granted the ROW.
No.
you can only have 1 adult in the car. only 1 adult in the car at a time.
a legal right is a right based in law e.g the right to vote at 18
You can refuse a field sobriety test and that is your right and you cannot be punished from refusal alone. If you refuse a blood or urine or breathe test then you automatically have your driver's license suspended for a year.
Yes, actually that is the law in ALL states. You may not deny someone access to a public right-of-way, by barring passage over your property.
The federal law
TRUE
no. when it comes to the right-of-way traffic regulations, the reality is the law gives no driver the right-of-way. traffic regulations only state who must yield the right-of-way.
A) The Union of the United States was an agreement among independent states. B) The independence of states was a threat to the Union. C) He felt the Constitution clearly gave states this right. D) The Supreme Court ruled that it was the right of states to challenge laws they considered unconstitutional.
The Motor Voter law is clearly unconstitutional. The Constitutional right to vote is extended only to legal citizens. The Motor Voter law extends voting rights to those who have a driver's license. It is not necessary to be a citizen to have a driver's license, and by extension gain access to our constitutionally mandated right to vote. Therfore, it is absolutely unconstitutional. Someone needs to challenge this in court. They will win.
The law clearly states a permitted drive must drive with a license driver at all times. You also are not permitted to drive after dark. One policeman is not the law in Maryland and you will find that out the next time you get pulled over and its costly.
Note: the law does not allow anyone the right-of-way, it only states who must yield. If two drivers arrive at an uncontrolled intersection at the same time, the driver on the left should yield to the driver on the right. When someone is legally required to yield the right-of-way and fails to yield, other drivers are required to yield for safety.
Researching this topic has shown that all states have some form of Lemon law. The website "Car Lemon" has a full list of Lemon Law summaries by state but clearly states at the top that all states are protected by the Federal Lemon Law.
No. Federal law states that you can only possess one licence, and it must be from your current state of residence.
The right of states to veto federal law
The implied consent law says a driver has agreed in advance to take a blood alcohol test:
The right of states to veto federal law
A quarter mile. If not correct answer - change the law. California law states - Your high beams have to be dimmed within 300 feet of following another driver and within 500 feet of an oncoming driver.