They believed in the constitution and that it is based on "We The People" and not just individual rights to others.
Some conservative and religious groups in the Philippines oppose the Rizal Law, which mandates the teaching of José Rizal's life and works in schools. They argue that it promotes secular and anti-Catholic beliefs.
Yes, William Livingston did own slaves. While he was known for his anti-slavery beliefs and advocacy in public life, he maintained slaves on his property in New Jersey as part of the prevailing society norms at the time.
Tactics to end the slave trade were diverse in order to reach the most people. Poets wrote about anti-slavery, sugar boycotts ensued, speeches were made, and homes were visited in order to spread the word.
There are many difficulties that can be encountered, some of which include; - some people not taking policies seriously - the development of the 'resentment culture' - people not understanding the importance of promoting and implementing anti-discriminatory practice - difference in value systems and beliefs
You might attend an anti-slavery rally or protest advocating for the abolition of slavery.
scrappy
They were against the Constitution to be ratified and become their official law for America.
what is a opponet
i dont know but if u know send me the answer at davisalgado2@yahoo.com
There were two sides to the Great Debate: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists did not.
There were two sides to the Great Debate: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists did not.
The Federalists, who were for the ratification of the Constitution, and the Anti-federalists, who were against the ratification.
Anti-Federalists
They thought that state governments should be more powerful than national governments.
anti-federalists.
no they were leaders of the anti-federalists.
The federalists supported the constitution but the anti federalists wanted to change/tweak the constitution.