answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The term caveat emptor is taken from Roman law and means in Latin, "let the buyer beware". In the absence of a stated guarantee or warranty from the seller, a buyer takes what he buys, "as is", and without any guarantee or warranty as to its authenticity, age, condition, freedom from defect or the like. The buyer has the responsibility for inspecting, authenticating, testing or otherwise verifying that the item is what he thinks it is. The modern law of sales implies warranties of fitness for an item's intended purpose. If the seller wishes to deal without warranty or guarantee, the seller must disclaim or limit the existence of a warranty. Formal terms are not necessary. Whether a warranty is given or not would depend upon a reasonable buyer's interpretation of what is said. Warranties involve statements of fact. ("This car has never been repainted"). A statement expressed as the seller's opinion ("I don't think this car has been repainted" is not a warranty or guaranty unless seller purports to be an expert. Enthusiastic salesmanship ("..the best paint finish you will find on any car lot..." does not create a warranty. Ultimately each case stands on its own set of facts and many variations of these basic ideas may be found. Many lawsuits involve disputed issues what was said by whom, and in such cases the jury decides. Where the caveat emptor rule has been modified by statute, the terms of the statute must be followed closely by the party seeking the protection of the statute.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

3d ago

Exceptions to the Doctrine of Caveat Emptor include:

  1. Misrepresentation by the seller
  2. Nondisclosure of material facts by the seller
  3. Implied warranties, such as the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose
  4. The sale of goods covered by consumer protection laws
This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

CAVEAT EMPTOR, or buyer beware, can carry a seller just so far. It may work when a private owner sells an old junker "AS IS". However, in other instances a savvy consumer can use several legal principles to counter the doctrine of caveat emptor:


  • fraudulent or negligent misrepresentation
  • unfair business practices
  • if the product or services do not meet reasonable levels of merchantibility or practice standards
  • reasonable expectations
  • special state consumer laws that protect consumers such as lemon laws or demand letters
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the exceptions to the Doctrine of Caveat Emptor?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law

Which of these most nearly define caveat emptor?

Caveat emptor is a Latin phrase that means "let the buyer beware." It indicates that the buyer is responsible for examining goods or property before purchase, as the seller may not disclose all potential issues or defects.


What is a caviot?

If you mean caveat, it is a warning about the nature of an agreement.A common usage, caveat emptor ('buyer beware'), warns that in making a purchase, the buyer must look out for his own interests.So for example, in buying a used car which is being sold 'as is' (without warranty), it is up to the buyer to examine it to determine whether there are defects affecting the purchase price or desirability of the car in question.


Exeptions to the doctrine of privity?

Some exceptions to the doctrine of privity of contract include the assignment of contractual rights, beneficiaries under a trust, and collateral warranties provided by third parties. These exceptions allow non-parties to a contract to enforce or benefit from the terms of the contract.


What are exceptions to collateral estoppel?

Exceptions to collateral estoppel include when the party against whom the doctrine is being invoked did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the previous action, or when there is new evidence that was not available in the previous action. Additionally, collateral estoppel may not apply if the issue in question is of public importance and should be reexamined for public policy reasons.


Review the discussion of the doctrine of election of remedies. What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of this doctrine?

The doctrine of election of remedies allows a party to choose a specific legal remedy to address a single harm. Advantages include providing flexibility to choose the most favorable remedy and avoiding double recovery. Disadvantages may arise when a party's choice limits their ability to pursue additional remedies or when the chosen remedy proves inadequate.