Some provisions of the Code of Kalantiyaw that may still be relevant today include the emphasis on respect for elders and authority figures, the promotion of peaceful resolution of conflicts, and the encouragement of honesty and integrity in dealings with others. These values can still be beneficial in fostering a harmonious and ethical society.
It depends on the laws in the specific jurisdiction where the couple resides. In some places, separated spouses may still be entitled to inherit from each other in the event of death, while in others, separation may impact inheritance rights. It is advisable to seek legal advice to understand the implications in the relevant jurisdiction.
false
A legal researcher can ensure a case is current and valid by checking for any subsequent appeals, citing references in more recent cases or legal texts, and confirming that there have been no changes in relevant laws or regulations since the case was decided. Additionally, using a reputable legal database or platform that provides updated information on cases is recommended.
That depends on the nature of the law involved 200 hundred years ago murder was against the law as was stealing etc and these laws are still relevant.ANSWER: I was thinking the same thing just the other day. You know like gravity? Is it really relevant today? I mean, come on! How old is that law? What about murder, how the hell old is this law? Theft? Just another ancient law written by old guys who aren't nearly as sophisticated as you and I. And what about Murphy's law? It may not be as old as things like the Ten Commandments, or even gravity, but who cares? Does anyone know who the hell Murphy even is? If what can go wrong, right? It will go wrong because everything is wrong, right? Wrong, wrong, wrong! If everything is wrong, then how can it possibly go wrong, right? I say any law written before yesterday be repealed as irrelevant and useless. Does anybody know the statutory construction for repealing gravity?
it would be both fault the first shouldve went n the other shouldve stop unless there brakes r brokeHaving a police officer say it is your fault will insure you loose in court unless you can produce evedence that he made an error. Not say it, prove it.
The Crucible is still relevant today as mass fear, and political scapegoating still occurs.
The Crucible is still relevant today as mass fear, and political scapegoating still occurs.
Present perfect. Present perfect is formed with have / has + past participle. transformed is the past participle of transform
come on man, you should know this. stop working on your odessey packet for latin class
The tense of the sentence "Laura has given donations to the local food bank" is present perfect. It indicates that the action of giving donations started in the past and is still relevant to the present.
"Has had" is the present perfect form of the verb "to have." It indicates that something started in the past and is still relevant in the present. For example, "She has had a lot of experience in her field."
When discussing your own ideas, use the present tense. When discussing the ideas of another person, use past or present tense depending on whether the idea is still relevant.
Yes it is still relevant in some parts
"The old American purposes are still wholly relevant" (John F. Kennedy).Meaning still completely relevant- or still completely of importance.
No
Of course it's relevant. There are wars happening as we speak.
Relevant in what way exactly? To pop culture? Certainly not in the way it was in its heyday but sure it's still relevant.