Southerners argued that slavery was a vital part of their economy, as plantations relied on enslaved labor for their profitability. They also argued that enslaved Black people were inferior and needed to be controlled for the well-being of society. Additionally, they believed that they were providing enslaved individuals with a certain level of care and protection.
because the south wanetd to keep their slaves, to market off the crops they planted and harvested. the north on the other hand opposed this because they were fully against slavery and wanted it to end. So many slaves were successfully escaping, so the north prayed that eventually the south just give up.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.
This statement suggests that slavery requires the complicity of individuals who are willing to enslave others. If people refuse to participate in or support the institution of slavery, it cannot exist. It emphasizes the role of individual choices and actions in perpetuating systems of oppression.
Slaves should not exist. All individuals should be treated with dignity, equality, and respect, and any form of slavery is a clear violation of human rights. It is essential to work towards eradicating slavery in all its forms and provide support to those affected by it.
They had a whole list of reasons. Some were; Slavery was in the Bible, slaves were happier as slaves, slaves had food and a place to live otherwise they wouldn't have that. These things, of course, are excuses, but it is what they used to rationalize slavery.
I would need the author of the book in order to give you an intellectual argument? you give me the authors name &I'll take you on.
They had a whole list of reasons. Some were; Slavery was in the Bible, slaves were happier as slaves, slaves had food and a place to live otherwise they wouldn't have that. These things, of course, are excuses, but it is what they used to rationalize slavery.
they protested that a ban would ruin the South's economy. Hope i helped :)
Texas is already a state.
If slavery were introduced into new states formed in the West, it would give slave states legislative equality with "free" states in Congress. This might prevent abolitionists from passing anti-slavery legislation.
That the slaves were much better off in America than they would have been in Africa. As the slavery debate intensified through the 1850's, they put pressure on the church ministers to declare that slavery was a perfect God-given arrangement of master and man.
President Truman had made a statement on June 27,1950 ordering the U.S air and sea forces to give the South Korean regime support
A pseudo argument is a statement that may appear to be an argument but lacks the required components of a valid argument, such as premises and conclusions that logically support each other. It may give the appearance of making a point but fails to provide sufficient evidence or reasoning to support its claim.
"Give credence to" means to believe or support something as being true or valid. It implies giving weight or significance to a particular idea or argument.
Citati is Italian for cited. A citation is a reference to an source. Citations can be used for to support an argument or to give credit to the originator of some work.
because the south wanetd to keep their slaves, to market off the crops they planted and harvested. the north on the other hand opposed this because they were fully against slavery and wanted it to end. So many slaves were successfully escaping, so the north prayed that eventually the south just give up.