Some of the common defenses for the one hundred plus people who were tried were:
Winston Churchill wanted the defendants of the Nuremberg trials to be executed without a trial or due process. He believed that those responsible for the atrocities committed during World War II deserved the ultimate punishment without delay.
The defendants in the Tokyo Trials were charged with crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, while the defendants in the Nuremberg Trials were charged with crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes against peace. Both trials aimed to hold individuals accountable for their roles in the atrocities committed during World War II.
A total of 22 high-ranking Nazis and Nazi supporters were tried by the IMT (or International Military Tribunal). For a list of the 22 defendants and their sentences, please see the Related Link below. See the "Main Trial" section of the Wikipedia article for the information you seek.
The Nuremberg trials ended with the sentencing of top Nazi officials for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide committed during World War II. Twelve defendants received the death penalty, three were acquitted, and others received various prison sentences. The trials set a precedent in international law for prosecuting individuals responsible for atrocities committed during times of conflict.
A total of 22 high-ranking Nazis and Nazi supporters were tried by the IMT (or International Military Tribunal). For a list of the 22 defendants and their sentences, please see the Related Link below. See the "Main Trial" section of the Wikipedia article for the information you seek.
"We were following orders"
The defendants at the Nuremberg Trials were accused of crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes against peace. These included atrocities such as genocide, mass murder, torture, and enslavement committed during World War II.
Winston Churchill wanted the defendants of the Nuremberg trials to be executed without a trial or due process. He believed that those responsible for the atrocities committed during World War II deserved the ultimate punishment without delay.
The defendants in the Tokyo Trials were charged with crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, while the defendants in the Nuremberg Trials were charged with crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes against peace. Both trials aimed to hold individuals accountable for their roles in the atrocities committed during World War II.
They claimed that they were just following orders.
They claimed that they were just following orders.
They claimed that they were just following orders.
They claimed that they were just following orders.
A total of 22 high-ranking Nazis and Nazi supporters were tried by the IMT (or International Military Tribunal). For a list of the 22 defendants and their sentences, please see the Related Link below. See the "Main Trial" section of the Wikipedia article for the information you seek.
The Nuremberg trials ended with the sentencing of top Nazi officials for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide committed during World War II. Twelve defendants received the death penalty, three were acquitted, and others received various prison sentences. The trials set a precedent in international law for prosecuting individuals responsible for atrocities committed during times of conflict.
A total of 22 high-ranking Nazis and Nazi supporters were tried by the IMT (or International Military Tribunal). For a list of the 22 defendants and their sentences, please see the Related Link below. See the "Main Trial" section of the Wikipedia article for the information you seek.
At the trials they followed the format of telling the defendants what they were charged with, then the defendants had to declare whether or not they were guilty or innocent. The Military Attorney who was the prosecutor presented his cases and evidence of proof against the defendants. Witnesses were called and both attorney for the defense and the prosecution to question. After the prosecutions case was presented (which took months considering they tried many all at once) the defense attorneys presented their defense cases and the witnesses were called again. Once that was done, the trial was recessed, The judges (not a jury) took all the information and decided who was guilty or innocent. They decided on the sentencing. When all that was done the Judges recalled the court to session and they read each defendants acquittal or conviction status on each charge, then their sentences if convicted. The convicted defendants were then taken to have their sentence carried out. The acquitted were released. The Judges came from many nations and different courts.