This is generally a euphemism for the theory of "an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth."
Making the punishment fit the crime means ensuring that the severity of the punishment matches the seriousness of the offense committed. It aims to ensure that the punishment is proportional and appropriate to the harm caused by the criminal act. This principle is a fundamental aspect of justice and aims to maintain a sense of fairness and equity in the criminal justice system.
This quote means that laws that are too lenient are often disregarded by people, while laws that are too harsh are rarely enforced due to public backlash or impracticality. Franklin is suggesting that finding a balanced approach to law enforcement is crucial for ensuring compliance and justice in society.
The ruling was deemed unjust by many who felt that the punishment did not fit the crime.
Punishment should be fair and proportionate to the offense, taking into account factors like intent and impact. It should aim to rehabilitate the offender and also deter future criminal behavior. The justice system should prioritize both accountability and the potential for redemption.
Imposing heavier fines on the rich can be seen as fair due to the principle of proportionality, where the punishment should fit the crime and the individual's ability to pay. Wealthier individuals may be better able to absorb the financial impact of a higher fine compared to those with lower incomes. This approach aims to discourage behaviors that are harmful or illegal, regardless of an individual's financial situation.
A discretionary sentence is a type of sentence imposed by a judge within a specified range, allowing the judge the flexibility to consider various factors and circumstances surrounding the case before determining the final sentence. This type of sentence gives judges the discretion to tailor the punishment to fit the individual circumstances of the case.
"Let the punishment fit the crime."
Yes, the punishment should fit the crime to ensure fairness, proportionality, and justice. Matching the severity of punishment to the seriousness of the offense helps to maintain trust in the legal system and promote deterrence.
the 8th amendment
The biggest weakness in the justice system is; the punishment doesn't fit the crime.
Cesare Beccaria
It depends on what said child did, does the punishment fit the crime?
They should be punished. The severity of the punishment however needs to fit the crime that took place.
This quote means that laws that are too lenient are often disregarded by people, while laws that are too harsh are rarely enforced due to public backlash or impracticality. Franklin is suggesting that finding a balanced approach to law enforcement is crucial for ensuring compliance and justice in society.
If it is proven that you lied, you can be held in contempt of court. It would then be at the judge's discretion to assess punishment, which could include being fined, time in jail, or both. I would guess that the severity of punishment would "fit the crime, " in other words, depending on what impact your lie had on the outcome of the original matter.
Up until the early 20th century horse thieves were hung. It seems like a very harsh punishment for the crime but it actually makes some sense. People depended on their horses for many things. At times a person's livelyhood and occationally their very lives depended on having a horse. For the time, the punishment fit the crime.
The sentencing philosophy aims to achieve retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation for the offender. The central purpose of criminal punishment is to promote justice, maintain social order, and protect society from further harm.
Let the Punishment Fit the Child - 1997 was released on: USA: 1 December 1997