Without more context provided, it is difficult to answer this question accurately. The fate of each would-be heir could vary greatly based on multiple factors such as the specific circumstances of their inheritance, any legal complications, the presence of a will, estate planning, and individual choices made by each heir.
When a patent owner dies, the patent is typically transferred to their estate or heirs. The estate or heirs can then decide to maintain or sell the patent rights.
You are asking if the spouse can inherit property instead of the heirs. I assume the heirs were listed in a will. In the United States, inheritance is in a state court. Each state has its own law. Without seeing the actual will, I can not comment on it. However it sounds like a mess. In this state it is difficult for a person to disinherit a spouse. I do not know about where you live. I would suggest seeing a local lawyer.
Yes, the property left to heirs becomes part of the individual's estate until it is transferred or sold by the heirs. The heirs inherit the property with the rights and responsibilities associated with ownership while it remains part of the estate.
Yes, all heirs typically need to agree to the sale of property when there is no will. Each heir has a legal right to inherit a portion of the property, so their consent is usually required for any decision regarding the sale of the property. If an agreement cannot be reached, a court may need to be involved to determine the outcome.
If the claimant is deceased and the estate settlement occurred years ago, the net settlement would typically be distributed according to the terms outlined in the deceased claimant's will or through the laws of intestacy if there was no will. The net settlement would become part of the deceased claimant's estate and would be distributed to the rightful heirs or beneficiaries as per the established legal guidelines.
It would pass to their heirs unless other agreements were made.
When a person dies and has no heirs or next of kin their property "escheats" to the state.
The last surviving owner would have owned the property at death and it would pass to her/his heirs according to their will or the laws of intestacy if they had no will. Their estate would need to be probated in order for title to pass to their heirs legally.
Julius Caesar's heirs were, Octavius, who was the main beneficiary inheriting 3/4 of his estate. Lucius Pinarius and Quintus Pedius were also heirs each getting 1/8 of his estate. Ironically, Decius Brutus, one of Caesar's assassins was mentioned as an heir in the second degree, who would only inherit if the main heirs refused the legacy.
If the named beneficiaries are no longer living, they had no heirs and there are no other heirs-at-law under the state laws of intestacy, the estate would 'escheat' (pass) to the state. You can check the laws of intestacy at the related question link provided below.
That child's interest would pass to any living parent and if no parent to their siblings.
Julius Caesar's heirs were, Octavius, who was the main beneficiary inheriting 3/4 of his estate. Lucius Pinarius and Quintus Pedius were also heirs each getting 1/8 of his estate. Ironically, Decius Brutus, one of Caesar's assassins was mentioned as an heir in the second degree, who would only inherit if the main heirs refused the legacy.Julius Caesar's heirs were, Octavius, who was the main beneficiary inheriting 3/4 of his estate. Lucius Pinarius and Quintus Pedius were also heirs each getting 1/8 of his estate. Ironically, Decius Brutus, one of Caesar's assassins was mentioned as an heir in the second degree, who would only inherit if the main heirs refused the legacy.Julius Caesar's heirs were, Octavius, who was the main beneficiary inheriting 3/4 of his estate. Lucius Pinarius and Quintus Pedius were also heirs each getting 1/8 of his estate. Ironically, Decius Brutus, one of Caesar's assassins was mentioned as an heir in the second degree, who would only inherit if the main heirs refused the legacy.Julius Caesar's heirs were, Octavius, who was the main beneficiary inheriting 3/4 of his estate. Lucius Pinarius and Quintus Pedius were also heirs each getting 1/8 of his estate. Ironically, Decius Brutus, one of Caesar's assassins was mentioned as an heir in the second degree, who would only inherit if the main heirs refused the legacy.Julius Caesar's heirs were, Octavius, who was the main beneficiary inheriting 3/4 of his estate. Lucius Pinarius and Quintus Pedius were also heirs each getting 1/8 of his estate. Ironically, Decius Brutus, one of Caesar's assassins was mentioned as an heir in the second degree, who would only inherit if the main heirs refused the legacy.Julius Caesar's heirs were, Octavius, who was the main beneficiary inheriting 3/4 of his estate. Lucius Pinarius and Quintus Pedius were also heirs each getting 1/8 of his estate. Ironically, Decius Brutus, one of Caesar's assassins was mentioned as an heir in the second degree, who would only inherit if the main heirs refused the legacy.Julius Caesar's heirs were, Octavius, who was the main beneficiary inheriting 3/4 of his estate. Lucius Pinarius and Quintus Pedius were also heirs each getting 1/8 of his estate. Ironically, Decius Brutus, one of Caesar's assassins was mentioned as an heir in the second degree, who would only inherit if the main heirs refused the legacy.Julius Caesar's heirs were, Octavius, who was the main beneficiary inheriting 3/4 of his estate. Lucius Pinarius and Quintus Pedius were also heirs each getting 1/8 of his estate. Ironically, Decius Brutus, one of Caesar's assassins was mentioned as an heir in the second degree, who would only inherit if the main heirs refused the legacy.Julius Caesar's heirs were, Octavius, who was the main beneficiary inheriting 3/4 of his estate. Lucius Pinarius and Quintus Pedius were also heirs each getting 1/8 of his estate. Ironically, Decius Brutus, one of Caesar's assassins was mentioned as an heir in the second degree, who would only inherit if the main heirs refused the legacy.
Nothing "happens". Heirs and assigns are words traditionally used in deeds to convey a fee simple interest or absolute ownership. It just means that mom and son own the property together and each can leave their interest to their heirs if they own as tenants in common, or they can sell the property.
Her heirs would be her next of kin or whoever she names in any will.
When a patent owner dies, the patent is typically transferred to their estate or heirs. The estate or heirs can then decide to maintain or sell the patent rights.
In Catholicism, the spiritual heirs of Peter would be the succession of popes.
Slaves were sold as personal property by living owners or left to their heirs in a will after their death. If there was no will the slaves would pass to the heirs at law according to the laws of intestacy of that time period.Slaves were sold as personal property by living owners or left to their heirs in a will after their death. If there was no will the slaves would pass to the heirs at law according to the laws of intestacy of that time period.Slaves were sold as personal property by living owners or left to their heirs in a will after their death. If there was no will the slaves would pass to the heirs at law according to the laws of intestacy of that time period.Slaves were sold as personal property by living owners or left to their heirs in a will after their death. If there was no will the slaves would pass to the heirs at law according to the laws of intestacy of that time period.