The Santa Clara County Superior Court is a trial court in California with various departments that handle different types of cases. Department numbers within the court typically correspond to specific judges or courtroom assignments. For specific information about Department XX, it is best to contact the Santa Clara County Superior Court directly or visit their website for more details.
I am forbidden to say something, if it is rude, or offensive. (this has nothing to do with me) xx
Slaves on a slave ship were usually packed tightly together, with very limited space. Conditions were crowded, unsanitary, and oppressive. Slaves were often chained and had to endure long journeys in extremely harsh and inhumane conditions.
It is a valuable tool used by chemists to identify chemical components or biological materials that might be clues to a crime. Chromatography is a way of separating chemicals from one another. One of those chemicals might shed light on the crime or provide investigators with leads or answers useful in solving the crime. Chromatography was developed by a Russian botanist in 1906 to study plant pigments. Then chemists realized it was an excellent way to study all kinds of complex mixtures. Forensic science jumped all over that one in order to identify unknown samples from a crime scene! Win-win!
found an example on line. Hope it helps Dear Judge Campbell: I have known Mr. Smith for 20 years through the church. Mr. Smith's lawyer has informed us that he has pled guilty to possession of an automatic weapon. I understand that this is against the law. I would ask that you please consider putting Ron on probation. He is not a criminal. He has always worked really hard throughout his life to help his friends and family. I believe that he will not violate the law again and that he has learned from this. Very truly yours, Steve Brown The letter example above is okay, but do not follow it word for word or even by form. Okay, sorry, it's not so good. Write your own letter. Speak from your heart. Those who have been convicted are going to serve time or some sort; be that on probation, house arrest, modified sentencing, jail, or prison is entirely up to the judge. Too many glowing recommendations have a tendency--as I've observed--to push judges toward harsher sentencings. I think that might be due to the question that seems obvious: if the person being recommended is such a fine citizen/friend/family member, why did he break the law? And, then the guilty party gets made an example of. Do not tell the judge "He is not a criminal." If he was found guilty by the judge or a jury of his peers, then guilt is a foregone conclusion, no matter how innocent he might in reality be. If he is convicted, he is guilty, hence he is a criminal. Do not tell the judge, "He will not violate the law again," especially if you have just told the judge he is not a criminal. Do you see the contradiction? Besides, you don't know that. Do you want to be held responsible if he does break the law again. Do be supportive. Express what you hope to accomplish, how you hope to help the person. Let the judge know that the convict has someone in his corner. One of the biggest reasons for lengthy sentences is the lack of a support system that is directly linked to higher recidivism rates. And this last part might seem like bad advice, and might be difficult for some. Avoid references to church, Christianity, spiritual change, salvation, conversion, etc. Far too many convicted people have usedChristianity as a sort of emergency exit strategy. It has worked in the past, but the success of such attempts is waining. Judges and parole boards are reacting harshly to those who publicly profess Christianity or some other form of religious faith, especially if they did not demonstrate it in their lives previous to the criminal infraction. Judges give harsher sentences and parole boards more readily give parole denials. If you mention it, do so very briefly and keep it in the context of how you know the person: i.e. "We have been members of the same Bible study group for XX years," or "We have been members of the same church for XX years."Do not give the person's testimony for him. Let him do that, and if you talk to him before he goes before the judge, tell him to let his demeanor and actions give his testimony. Again, and I can't stress this enough, speak from your heart. You are not going to successfully BS a judge (well, most judges). Likely as not your letter will have little affect on the sentencing outcome, but nothing ventured, nothing gained. Trying to help won't hurt. That is provided you take suggestions well.
The name of a court title is what ever the court case is about xx
The name of a court title is what ever the court case is about xx
Santa will be in England at 12:00pm midnight xx
Well, on court its 7 per team :) but there has to be like 2 or 3 substitutes :)) xx Fifii xx
dont kno sorry xx
A secretary is the leader of an executive department
Yes on Christmas eve night but only if your believe in him though xx
xx xx xx
xx xx xx
5-6 inches xx
1911 January 12 judged by law in court. Jayneah xx
Debtors Control Account Balance b/d xx Cash/Bank xx Sales xx Discount Allowed xx Bank (Reverse Cheque) xx Return Inward xx Discount (cancelled) xx Bad Debts xx Other Charge by Debtor xx Contra xx Balance b/f xx total total Creditors Control Account Cash/Bank xx Balance B/d xx Discount Received xx Purchase xx Return Outward xx Others Charge By Creditors xx Contra xx Balance b/f xx total total