An example of a probative question could be "Can you provide evidence or examples to support your claim?" This type of question is used to ask for specific information that helps to prove or disprove a point.
1. Were there innocent people jailed at Alcatraz? 2. Can humans create smaller versions of black holes?
A strong example of how an applicant should respond to this question is by acknowledging a genuine area for improvement, demonstrating self-awareness, and emphasizing steps they are already taking to address or overcome this weakness. This shows honesty, humility, and a proactive approach to personal development.
For photographs to be admissible in court, they need to be both legal and relevant to the case. Legal material refers to whether the photographs were obtained lawfully without violating any privacy rights or laws. Relevance ensures that the photographs have probative value in helping to prove or disprove a fact in the case.
It is not possible to answer the question because different books number number the laws differently.
To respond to a leading question, you can rephrase the question in a neutral way or provide an answer that does not affirm the bias of the question. It's important to stay mindful of the bias in the question and respond in a way that reflects your own perspective or understanding of the situation.
Probative value refers to the ability of a piece of evidence to make a fact more or less probable in a legal context. Individual evidence, which is unique to a specific source (like a fingerprint), generally has more probative value than class evidence, which can only indicate a group (like a type of shoe print). This is because individual evidence can directly link a suspect to a crime, while class evidence lacks that specificity.
Polyester does
Dana Kahan has written: 'Ignoring probative incriminatory evidence'
Probative- tending to prove something that is material to a crime.
The difference is that I only work on math
the tendency of a given item of evidence to prove or disprove one of the legal elements of the case
Yes, "Is not an example of a from-my-brain question" is a statement rather than a question.
This question
An example of a convergent question is 'How do apples differ from oranges?'
Some types of items that can increase the probative value of soil include artifacts, biological materials (such as pollen or seeds), trace evidence (like fibers or hair), and chemical residues (such as drugs or explosives). These items can help provide information about past activities, environmental conditions, or potential sources of contamination.
An example of a well-structured research proposal question that includes the keyword "research proposal question example" could be: "What are the key components of an effective research proposal question example and how do they contribute to the success of a research study?"
Prosecutors can use indictment to show that the accusation and the probative value of evidences are significant or to use indictment to get a plea bargain. Significance of an indictment is only as significant of the alleged crime, the existence of evidence with probative value, and the sentence being sought. Whether the charge leads to a trial depends on the outcome of Preliminary Hearing. The prosecutor has to prove during the "preliminary hearing" that 1) there is enough evidence with probative value to convict the accused; and 2) it would be in the public's interest to conduct the trial and convict the accused. If a charge is brought on through indictment, the accused is entitled for a trial by jury. In Canada minor insignificant accusations can also be charged through indictment. In insignificant cases the value of indictment would probably be in the plea bargain as it does not make sense to try an insignificant case in a trial by jury.