answersLogoWhite

0

Informed consent in the medical context applies in two primary areas: (1) medical procedures, and (2) medical research. It is a principle of relatively recent origin in the law.

As a legal principle it is something of an offshoot of the reverse proposition that an unwanted or "unconsented to" touching is in the nature of assault and battery, which was first clearly set forth in a New York case (Schloendorff vs. Society of New York Hospital, 211 N.Y. 125, 105 N.E. 92 (1914), Opinion by Louis Brandeis). Actually there was at least one prior case in Illinois on point, but Schloendorff's opinion went on at length and is a good fundamental treatise on the subject. As to medical research, perhaps the most important initial case in the area revolved around what was called the "Tuskegee" experiment that was finally terminated in 1972. Subjects with syphilis were told they were being treated but were in fact not given proven treatment and were even discouraged from seeking help elsewhere. This travesty went on for some 40 years until somebody leaked the truth -- after people died or contracted the disease from subjects and children were born with it.

Courts wrestled with the legal concepts involved. Ultimately it has come to mean that you as the patient (in a medical procedure) or as the subject (of medical research) are entitled to be given as much information as is available about the situation as well as its possible outcomes so that you can make your own decision about whether to undergo the procedure or participate in the study, based on the information provided.

"Informed consent" is today a fundamental biomedical ethical concept, tenet and mantra that is the subject of many books, articles, lectures and presentations both here and internationally. To attempt to survey it in this context would be a disservice to the concept's breadth and depth. However, suffice it to say that if you need to have surgery for a broken leg and the surgeon does not explain that after the procedure you will not be able to stand without assistance and then afterwards you try to stand up and you fall down and break your arm, you may have a claim against the surgeon for negligence resulting in your broken arm.

While the general concept of "consent" applies in other legal settings, we hope this is what you were talking about.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Law

Can executors fee be put on settlement statement without prior approval of all beneficiaries?

It depends on the specific laws and regulations of the region where the estate is being settled. In some cases, executor fees can be included in the settlement statement without prior approval of beneficiaries if the terms were agreed upon in the will or approved by the court. It is generally advisable for the executor to communicate and obtain consent from beneficiaries to avoid potential disputes.


Does collateral estoppel prevail and be upheld when default judgment is entered in a prior case of same issues?

Collateral estoppel may still apply in subsequent cases even if a default judgment was entered in a prior case on the same issues. However, the court will need to determine if the default judgment resulted from a deliberate decision not to contest the issues, which could impact the application of collateral estoppel.


What is the significance of secret prior art in the context of intellectual property law?

Secret prior art is significant in intellectual property law because it refers to information that is not publicly known but can still impact the validity of a patent or trademark. This hidden information can be used to challenge the novelty or inventiveness of a claimed invention, potentially leading to the rejection or invalidation of the intellectual property rights. It underscores the importance of thorough research and disclosure in the application process to ensure the protection of original ideas.


Explain the basis of common law?

Common law is based on judicial decisions and precedents established in court cases. It relies on the principle of stare decisis, which means that decisions made in prior cases serve as a basis for resolving similar issues in future cases. This system of law contrasts with civil law, which is based on codified statutes.


What is the legal age of sexual consent for a female in Georgia?

In most Georgia counties both of you have to be 18 to apply for a marriage license. If you are 16-17yo you will need parental consent and in some counties also a probate judge has to approve the marriage license application.

Related Questions

What is informed consent?

Prior to participating in research, the subject is given information about the nature of the research, procedures, and any consequences that might occur.


How long is a surgical consent good for?

In the state of Louisiana if a surgical consent is signed prior to surgery how long is that consent good for?


What are the release dates for The Law - 1975 Prior Consent 1-2?

The Law - 1975 Prior Consent 1-2 was released on: USA: 26 March 1975


Does the Australian army drug test upon enlistment?

They drug test you on your assessment day prior to employment within the Defence Force, you do not have to consent to the test as you are not an employee just yet but this will obviously terminate your application process.


What age can you get a tattoo?

Well I think so look at this Sec. 13102. (1) An individual shall not tattoo, brand, or perform body-piercing on a minor unless the individual obtains the prior written informed consent of the minor's parent or legal guardian. Its from the Michigan State Website, so yes you can.


Why is prior knowledge so important in science?

Prior knowledge allows you to make a well-informed hypotheses and a better-planned experiment.


Who can access the intranet?

Individuals and organisations that have been given prior access and consent to utilise it.


Do you have to take TOEFL or IELTS test prior to sending your application to UCAS?

no


Had been informed vs were informed?

"Had been informed" is used to describe a past action that occurred before another past event, indicating that the informing happened prior to the event being discussed. "Were informed" simply describes a past event where information was given to someone at a certain point in time.


Is it Legal to record conversation from a computer at work?

Not unless you have the prior written consent of the people concerned !


Is copying CD good or no?

Copying CD's without the prior consent of the content owners - is illegal.


What are three ways that a hypothesis may arise?

Prior knowledge, logical inferences, and informed/creative imagination