answersLogoWhite

0

Rhetoric

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Argument for appellees the argument in this expert relies primarily on?

logos


In argument for appellees what best describes the passage?

The appellees will present their case by highlighting legal precedents and statutes that support their position, as well as arguments that counter the appellant's claims. They will aim to persuade the court that the lower court's decision was correct and should be upheld.


In argument for appellees which of the following best summarizes the thesis?

Because black children are already enjoying all the privileges of white children, integration is unnecessarily confusing for all the children involved.


Why is this passage from an Indian fathers plea an example of lakes use of logos?

because it uses specific evidence to support his argument. :) yw.


How does this passage present an example of Lake's use of logos as a rhetorical strategy?

Answer this question… It uses a vivid description of his culture to provide evidence to support his argument.


How does Thoreau use logos in this passage?

by showing soundness of his argument through a number of analogies


which argument is most clearly developed by the rhetoric used in this passage apex?

the defense of Russuain


What passage from an Indian father plea an example of lakes use of logos?

One example of logos in an Indian father's plea could be when he presents statistical data on the success rates of education and employment among children who follow the path he is advocating for. This evidence-based approach appeals to reason and rationality to support his argument.


What word from Abbeys passage best demonstrates ad hominem fallacy in his argument?

Slob. -Apex


What would be an example of argument?

Fighting


Which word from abbeys passage best demonstrates the ad hominem fallacy in his argument?

The word "incompetent" in Abbey's passage best demonstrates the ad hominem fallacy, as it attacks the character or abilities of the opponent rather than addressing the substance of the argument.


Can you provide an example of a valid argument?

An example of a valid argument is: "All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal." This argument is valid because the conclusion logically follows from the premises.