0
There are a number of constitutional rights to protect the accuse from either a wrongful conviction or a wrongful prosecution. These rights include those given in the Miranda warnings and the right to a jury trial. For more information see the related links below.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoIn the US, when a person is arrested they are told their rights which are as follows: The right to remain silent, and the right to an attorney. The court is obligated to provide you with an attorney if you can't afford one.
It depends on the country you are in.
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoCriminals, as in the convicted, only the basic civil rights. Criminals, as in the accused, they should not be, nor can they legally be denied any rights.
They only exception, and that is coming under fire, is the right to be Mirandized upon arrest in the event public interest cannot be immediately protected in so doing.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoyes, they have right! right to get caught an get imprison! and they have there right to live but not in the outside world but in the cage. but after they finish there service for there sins in the cage, they have there right to have a new life again and to be salvage.
Wiki User
∙ 15y agoive been in juvie trust me the only right we have is the right to remain silent
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which of the laws allowed criminals to be used as slaves?
An intermediate case between formal slavery and criminal law is when a convict is ... Brand marks have also been used as a punishment for convicted criminals.
The Nuremberg Trials held Japanese war criminals accountable for crimes agenst humanity in violation of the rules of war true or false?
The first Nuremberg trial were only for the European war criminals (Class-A). Subsequent Nuremberg trials were held for lesser criminals. Other European countries also held separate trials for lesser war criminals (Class B & C). The International Military Tribunal for the Far Ear were for major Japanese war criminals (Class-A). Other countries held separate trials for lesser (Class-B and C) war criminals. Also after WWI Germany agreed to hold war crimes trials but since the allies did not occupy the German/Austrian nations, the trials were not generally successful, thought the court did its best.
What is aztec law and order?
instead of putting criminals in prison they get killed instead .
What was the popurse of the Nuremberg law?
The purpose of the trials was to prosecute the Nazi leadership and war criminals .
What is the possessive form of a woman's rights?
A woman's rights (the rights of one woman)The women's rights (the rights of several or all women)
John Locke did NOT argue that natural rights included the right to?
criminals do no not deserve to have rights
Can convicted felons own property in Massachusetts?
yes because they have the rights they are criminals but they have rights to.
What was one of the accomplishment of the warren?
it broadened the individual rights of accused criminals
Why should human rights not be for criminals?
They r talking away other ppl's human rights so why shud they deserve human rights? Y?
What was one of the accomplishments of the warren court?
it broadened the individual rights of accused criminals
When was it passed that criminals wouldn't have rights to a gun?
1968 gun control act I believe.
The Roman's first code of law dealt with what two issues?
property rights punishment for criminals
Do criminals get law attorneys?
All criminals are allowed a lawyer that is part of the maranda rights. Also they get a public defender if they can not afford a lawyer. Lawyers are not just for the guilty they are for the innocent as well.
Which of the bill of rights for criminals don't apply to the states?
The Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution is for everybody, not just criminals.You may be inquiring about the Incorporation doctrine.
Can anyone substantiate that criminals have more rights to be parents than Soldiers who serve their country?
Your question is unclear.
Which case is correctly matched with the principle it established?
Miranda v. Arizona-suspected criminals must be read their rights
Whose court case established that accused criminals must be informed of their rights?
Miranda v. Arizona, (1966).
