There are a number of constitutional rights to protect the accuse from either a wrongful conviction or a wrongful prosecution. These rights include those given in the Miranda warnings and the right to a jury trial. For more information see the related links below.
The Nuremberg Laws were a set of antisemitic laws implemented in Nazi Germany in 1935. The purpose of these laws was to institutionalize discrimination against Jews, stripping them of their rights as citizens and segregating them from the rest of society.
The first Nuremberg trial were only for the European war criminals (Class-A). Subsequent Nuremberg trials were held for lesser criminals. Other European countries also held separate trials for lesser war criminals (Class B & C). The International Military Tribunal for the Far Ear were for major Japanese war criminals (Class-A). Other countries held separate trials for lesser (Class-B and C) war criminals. Also after WWI Germany agreed to hold war crimes trials but since the allies did not occupy the German/Austrian nations, the trials were not generally successful, thought the court did its best.
Criminals are kept in Prision they are kept there for more time according to what they did, Murder sometime may end up as a life sentence.
A woman's rights (the rights of one woman)The women's rights (the rights of several or all women)
Robert H. Jackson served as the chief prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials of Nazi war criminals. He was an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.
yes because they have the rights they are criminals but they have rights to.
criminals do no not deserve to have rights
it broadened the individual rights of accused criminals
it broadened the individual rights of accused criminals
They r talking away other ppl's human rights so why shud they deserve human rights? Y?
1968 gun control act I believe.
property rights punishment for criminals
All criminals are allowed a lawyer that is part of the maranda rights. Also they get a public defender if they can not afford a lawyer. Lawyers are not just for the guilty they are for the innocent as well.
The Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution is for everybody, not just criminals.You may be inquiring about the Incorporation doctrine.
Your question is unclear.
Miranda v. Arizona, (1966).
Miranda v. Arizona-suspected criminals must be read their rights