answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The trial court dismissed the case but the court of appeals reversed and remanded to trial court. The was liable. Although there is no rule requiring one to assist a good samaritan, you cannot interfere with a good samaritan trying to help. Here, the bartender owed a duty to the plaintiff's decedent to permit the good samaritan to call the police, since the phone was in the public portion of the business.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

2d ago

In Soldano v. O'Daniels, the court ruled that there was no constitutional right to privacy for conversations conducted in public places, such as a jail visitation area. The court found that police recording these conversations did not violate the Fourth Amendment rights of the individuals involved.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the courth decision about soldano vs o'daniels?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law

Was Roger Taney chief of justice during dred Scott vs sanford decision?

Yes, Roger Taney was the Chief Justice of the United States during the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision in 1857. He famously authored the majority opinion in the case, which declared that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States.


Why was the Supreme Court decision in the case of Dred Scott vs Sanford considered a victory by the Southerners?

Southerners saw the Dred Scott decision as a victory because it upheld the rights of slaveholders to take their slaves into any state or territory, regardless of whether slavery was legal there. The decision also declared that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not American citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court, reinforcing the notion that they were property, not people.


Who was the known slave that sued for his freedom in the case Dred Scott vs Sandford?

Dred Scott was the known slave who sued for his freedom in the case Dred Scott v. Sandford. The Supreme Court decision ruled against Scott, stating that as a slave, he was not a US citizen and therefore could not sue in federal court. This decision further fueled tensions over slavery in the US leading up to the Civil War.


What happened in the supreme court case Dred Scott vs sanford?

In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, the Supreme Court ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered citizens and thus could not sue in federal court. The decision also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional as it exceeded Congress's authority to regulate slavery in territories. This decision further polarized the nation on the issue of slavery and was a significant factor leading up to the Civil War.


Which supreme court ruling declared that grange laws were constitutional because railroads provided a public service and therefore were not completely private?

Munn v. Illinois (1877) was the supreme court ruling that declared that grange laws were constitutional. The decision was based on the argument that railroads provided a public service and therefore were not completely private.

Related questions

What did the supreme court decision vs the board of education do?

Brown vs. The Board of Education- Supreme Court decision that made segregation in schools unconstitutional. Linda Brown vs. Topeka, Kansas.


Who won Khan vs maidana?

Khan. By unanimous decision


What was the main reason for the decision of Gregg vs Georgia?

12


Marbury v. Madison was an ingenious decision because it?

Marbury vs Madison was an ingenious decision. Marbury vs Madison was the first case of judicial review that voided the act of congress.


What effect did the landmark supreme court decision in marbury vs madison have?

The effect of the landmark Supreme court decision in Marbury vs Madison helped in the separation of powers as far as the executive and legislature is concerned.


What does man vs feeling mean?

Man vs. Feeling is a form of conflict. This is the same as Man vs. Himself. Man vs. Feeling is like if you tried to make a decision or if you are having internal conflicts.


What was the majority decision in Roe Vs Wade?

The US Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of Roe vs. Wade.


How did the courts get the power of judicial review?

through the Maybury vs. Madison decision


How did the court's get the power of judicial review?

through the Maybury vs. Madison decision


How did the courts get the powers of judicial review?

through the Maybury vs. Madison decision


How did the courts get the power of the judicial review?

through the Maybury vs. Madison decision


How did the court get power of judicial review?

through the Maybury vs. Madison decision