answersLogoWhite

0

The trial court dismissed the case but the court of appeals reversed and remanded to trial court. The was liable. Although there is no rule requiring one to assist a good samaritan, you cannot interfere with a good samaritan trying to help. Here, the bartender owed a duty to the plaintiff's decedent to permit the good samaritan to call the police, since the phone was in the public portion of the business.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Law

Was Roger Taney chief of justice during dred Scott vs sanford decision?

Yes, Roger Taney was the Chief Justice of the United States during the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision in 1857. He famously authored the majority opinion in the case, which declared that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States.


Why was the Supreme Court decision in the case of Dred Scott vs Sanford considered a victory by the Southerners?

Southerners saw the Dred Scott decision as a victory because it upheld the rights of slaveholders to take their slaves into any state or territory, regardless of whether slavery was legal there. The decision also declared that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not American citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court, reinforcing the notion that they were property, not people.


Who was the known slave that sued for his freedom in the case Dred Scott vs Sandford?

Dred Scott was the known slave who sued for his freedom in the case Dred Scott v. Sandford. The Supreme Court decision ruled against Scott, stating that as a slave, he was not a US citizen and therefore could not sue in federal court. This decision further fueled tensions over slavery in the US leading up to the Civil War.


What happened in the supreme court case Dred Scott vs sanford?

In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, the Supreme Court ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered citizens and thus could not sue in federal court. The decision also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional as it exceeded Congress's authority to regulate slavery in territories. This decision further polarized the nation on the issue of slavery and was a significant factor leading up to the Civil War.


Which supreme court ruling declared that grange laws were constitutional because railroads provided a public service and therefore were not completely private?

Munn v. Illinois (1877) was the supreme court ruling that declared that grange laws were constitutional. The decision was based on the argument that railroads provided a public service and therefore were not completely private.

Related Questions