The defendants, Roy Bryant and J.W. Milam, were acquitted by an all-white jury in the trial for the murder of Emmett Till. The decision was met with outrage and highlighted the racial injustices prevalent in the United States at the time.
The two white men accused of killing Emmett Till were acquitted by an all-white jury in 1955. The verdict was widely criticized due to evidence of a racially motivated murder and later became a catalyst for the Civil Rights Movement.
After the trial of Emmett Till, Carolyn Bryant lived a quiet life out of the public eye. She continued to live in the same town where the trial took place. In 2017, it was revealed that she had admitted to fabricating parts of her testimony during the trial.
Emmett Till was the victim, so he did not receive a trial. The brothers accused of his murder did receive a trial. Although there were witnesses that IDed them entering the home at gunpoint, taking the boy, heard screaming and beating coming from their shed, and saw one them wearing the gun later, the jury came back with an innocent verdict. It took them barely over an hour, and they joked that it would not have taken them so long if they hadn't stopped to drink a pop. It could be fairly stated that Emmett Till did not get justice.
Witnesses testified to seeing the suspects in various situations involving Emmett, as well as IDing them as the men that abducted him at gunpoint from his uncle's home. The jury took 67 minutes, but stated they took a break so it would take longer and look good. They came back with a not guilty verdict.
The verdict in the Emmett Till murder case took just one hour for the all-white jury to acquit the two men accused of the crime. The decision sparked outrage and shed light on the deep-seated racial injustices in the American justice system.
The two white men accused of killing Emmett Till were acquitted by an all-white jury in 1955. The verdict was widely criticized due to evidence of a racially motivated murder and later became a catalyst for the Civil Rights Movement.
1955
September 19, 1955
Two months
After the trial of Emmett Till, Carolyn Bryant lived a quiet life out of the public eye. She continued to live in the same town where the trial took place. In 2017, it was revealed that she had admitted to fabricating parts of her testimony during the trial.
Emmett Till was the victim, so he did not receive a trial. The brothers accused of his murder did receive a trial. Although there were witnesses that IDed them entering the home at gunpoint, taking the boy, heard screaming and beating coming from their shed, and saw one them wearing the gun later, the jury came back with an innocent verdict. It took them barely over an hour, and they joked that it would not have taken them so long if they hadn't stopped to drink a pop. It could be fairly stated that Emmett Till did not get justice.
The Emmett Till murder trial brought to light the brutality of Jim Crow segregation in the South
Witnesses testified to seeing the suspects in various situations involving Emmett, as well as IDing them as the men that abducted him at gunpoint from his uncle's home. The jury took 67 minutes, but stated they took a break so it would take longer and look good. They came back with a not guilty verdict.
Roy Bryant and J.W. Milam are responsible for the murder of Emmett Till in the book "Mississippi Trial, 1955." They abducted Till from his great-uncle's house, brutally beat him, and then shot him before dumping his body in the Tallahatchie River.
Till it's over and the judge renders a verdict
His murder & trial started the Civil Rights Movement
The verdict in the Emmett Till murder case took just one hour for the all-white jury to acquit the two men accused of the crime. The decision sparked outrage and shed light on the deep-seated racial injustices in the American justice system.