The were doing what they were told.
Generally speaking, when slaves obey their masters it is to avoid being beaten or killed. Disobedient slaves are severely punished.
When slaves obeyed their masters, they often faced harsh conditions and were subject to physical punishment if they did not comply. Obedience to their masters did not always guarantee leniency or protection, as masters had the authority to mistreat and exploit their slaves as they saw fit.
They were doing God's will.
James Henley Thornwell, a theologian and philosopher from the 19th century, argued that slaves were fulfilling their moral duty when they obeyed their masters. He believed that obedience to authority, even in the context of slavery, was a divine principle that should be followed. Thornwell's views on slavery were based on his interpretation of Christianity and the moral philosophy of his time.
Slaves were forced to perform various tasks for their masters, including agricultural work, household chores, and other labor-intensive jobs. They had no autonomy and were expected to obey their master's orders without question. Failure to comply could result in punishment or even death.
Generally speaking, when slaves obey their masters it is to avoid being beaten or killed. Disobedient slaves are severely punished.
The slaves' masters would be beaten severely if they didn't follow orders.
When slaves obeyed their masters, they often faced harsh conditions and were subject to physical punishment if they did not comply. Obedience to their masters did not always guarantee leniency or protection, as masters had the authority to mistreat and exploit their slaves as they saw fit.
They were doing God's will.
James Henley Thornwell believed that by obeying their masters, slaves would fulfill their spiritual duty as outlined in the Bible and would consequently secure their own salvation. He viewed slavery as a God-ordained institution and believed that obedience and loyalty to masters would bring slaves closer to God.
the rights that slaves had was that they couldn't go out side unless they are finished doing their work,they work for their masters ,and they can not have attitude with their master
Basically to get what the masters wanted them to do. strict punishment for not doing what you are told, and setting an example for all the other slaves
James Henley Thornwell, a pro-slavery advocate, argued that when slaves obeyed their masters, they were fulfilling their God-ordained roles and contributing to the stability of society. Thornwell believed that obedience to masters was a form of religious duty for slaves.
The slaves worked all day and all nigh for however long there masters wanted them to work if they had to obey there masteres or they would be punished for not obeying them.
James Henley Thornwell, a theologian and philosopher from the 19th century, argued that slaves were fulfilling their moral duty when they obeyed their masters. He believed that obedience to authority, even in the context of slavery, was a divine principle that should be followed. Thornwell's views on slavery were based on his interpretation of Christianity and the moral philosophy of his time.
no they arent kind to slaves
Because, they were property to their slave masters, and the slave masters could do anything that they wanted to the slaves in order for the slaves to keep their lives.