answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What kind of due process mean that the rule of law will be fair?

substantive due process


What kind of due means that the rule of law will be fair?

substantive due process


What action is a court taking when it decides that it should strike down a legislative act that violates the rights of individuals?

When a court strikes down a legislative act that violates the rights of individuals, it is exercising its power of judicial review. This action involves the court assessing the constitutionality of the law and determining that it conflicts with the rights protected by the constitution. By invalidating the law, the court reinforces the rule of law and protects individual rights against government overreach. This process underscores the judiciary's role as a check on legislative and executive powers.


What kind of due process means that the rule of the law will be obeyed?

constitutional


What is the message that will appear if a user violates a validation rule?

validation text


How could one of the major organizations with the federal government most effectively interfere with congress's plan to enact and implement this new law?

the supreme court could rule that the law violates the first amendment


What rule requires that incriminating evidence by seized by police according to the constitutional specifications of due process or it will not be allowed as evidence in court?

Exclusionary Rule


What is the most common type of content found on the internet that violates the lolicon rule 34?

The most common type of content found on the internet that violates the lolicon rule 34 is sexually explicit material involving underage characters.


What is the legal concept of due process?

Law scholars argue over this all the time. "Due process" merely means "the process or procedure that is due to a defendant in our legal system." You have to look to the U.S. Constitution and cases, as well as statutes, regulations and rules of court for the standards that are to be applied. But what if the rules, cases and statutes don't apply? Say you have an "investigator" in a child abuse case who actually plants the ideas and facts that the child was abused or just says, over and over, "You can trust me, say you were abused, it's OK." There is no statute or court rule that says anything about this. It has to be wrong, but how can the defendant raise the issue? It's not the trial that is the problem. It's accepting what is most likely a false accusation and allowing the system to use it to find someone to be a perpetrator and to punish him (or her)? There is now scientific evidence that a child will make a false accusation unless the inquirer is careful not to force or coach a response. Courts have held that there must be a right not to be falsely convicted by well-meaning people following the law. That's when they reach for substantive due process. When the government tries to regulate other activities by statute or regulation, including such things as the right to raise children, the right to die, the right to vote, the right to be considered competent, the courts apply the idea of substantive due process to reach their results. There are always legal scholars and judges who insist that there can be no such thing as "substantive due process." Process has to be procedural, not substantive. That caused the U. S. Supreme Court to reach for a different concept in Griswold v Connecticut, finding a right to privacy in the "penumbra of the bill of rights."


What is the meaning of originating sin?

Originating sin is to bring into being act that violates a known moral rule.


How does the US Supreme Court affect the rights of citizens?

It affects citizens because you all live under these rights and they are there to protect your human and democratic rights so if they rule whatever changed they can affect the way you live and your rights.


Can a Michigan trail court decide an issue of federal law?

As a matter of law, no. The exception is in cases where a Federal Law is in effect and supersedes a local law. For example if you are sued by a collection agency and the agency violates the Fair Debt Collection Practices act, you could bring that to the attention of the court and absent any other laws, the court could rule in your favor.