The supreme court rules that companies must pay men and women equal wages despite earlier court rulings allowing wage differences. I've never encountered a question with more than two answers. Government is BS.
The Nuremberg Trials established the principle that individuals can be held accountable for committing crimes against humanity, even if they were following orders. This set a precedent for international law and established that individuals are responsible for their actions, regardless of their official role.
The Nuremberg Trials set a precedent for holding individuals accountable for war crimes and crimes against humanity. It established the principle that individuals are responsible for their actions, regardless of their official roles. This legacy continues to shape international law and the pursuit of justice for atrocities committed around the world today.
The main outcome of the Nuremberg trials was the establishment of the principle that individuals can be held accountable for war crimes and crimes against humanity. This helped set the foundation for future international tribunals and the development of international humanitarian law.
The Nuremberg trials resulted in the prosecution of prominent leaders for their role in war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during World War II. It established the principle that individuals could be held accountable for breaching international law, even if they were acting on behalf of a government. This set a precedent for future international criminal trials.
A good thesis statement for the Nuremberg trials could be: "The Nuremberg trials represented a significant moment in international law by establishing the principle of individual accountability for war crimes and crimes against humanity, setting a precedent for future trials of those responsible for atrocities committed during times of conflict."
The "are principle," often referred to in design and art as the "figure-ground" principle, describes how elements are perceived as either the focal point (figure) or the background (ground). This principle emphasizes contrast and differentiation, allowing one element to stand out against another. Effective use of this principle can enhance visual communication, making key messages or features more prominent and easily identifiable.
A nuclear exchange refers to a situation where two or more countries or parties engage in a conflict by using nuclear weapons against each other. It describes the scenario where nuclear weapons are detonated, leading to catastrophic destruction and loss of life.
The Nuremberg Trials established the principle that individuals can be held accountable for committing crimes against humanity, even if they were following orders. This set a precedent for international law and established that individuals are responsible for their actions, regardless of their official role.
George Washington set a precedent by sending federal troops, specifically a militia force commanded by General Henry Lee, to put down the Whiskey Rebellion in 1794. This decisive action demonstrated the federal government's willingness and ability to enforce its laws and maintain order. It reinforced the authority of the federal government and established the principle that rebellion against federal law would not be tolerated.
Henry Yorke has written: 'Reason urged against precedent, in a letter to the people of derby'
The term that describes a measurement of how hard an object pushes against a surface is "pressure."
What are the argue for and against historical cost as a principle of accounting in the preparation of final account of a sole trader?
One principle of libertarianism is the non-aggression principle, which emphasizes that individuals should not initiate force or coercion against others. This principle forms the basis for respecting individual rights and personal freedoms.
The Nuremberg Trials set a precedent for holding individuals accountable for war crimes and crimes against humanity. It established the principle that individuals are responsible for their actions, regardless of their official roles. This legacy continues to shape international law and the pursuit of justice for atrocities committed around the world today.
You question already describes the worst case scenario. The unsecured creditor hires an attorney, spends money to get a judgment and then can't collect the judgment. It is possible that the debtor may become solvent again. Then again, that person could also file for bankruptcy and the discharge could bar you from ever collecting that debt.
The main outcome of the Nuremberg trials was the establishment of the principle that individuals can be held accountable for war crimes and crimes against humanity. This helped set the foundation for future international tribunals and the development of international humanitarian law.
SECRET:)