The different cases are defined by the reason they are being heard in court. A criminal case - involves a breach of common law, and is presented to court by the police. (for example Mr I Steal has been arrested for burglary). A civil case is a 'dispute' between two or more people. (for example Mr A Vandal damaged a car in a private car-park)
The party who initiates a legal case is known as the plaintiff in a civil case or the prosecution in a criminal case. They are the ones bringing the case to court and seeking a resolution or remedy for the legal issue at hand.
There is no universal system of case number. However, most circuits are fairly intuitive. CR probably means that it is assigned to the criminal division.
The difference is which set of laws govern the issue at hand and what the punishment can be. Violating civil law is punishable by fines and mild restrictions. Violating criminal law in punishable by a wider set of fines and restrictions including jail or prison time and, in certain cases, death.
The difference between private and public law has already been described. Another important distinction is that between "civil" and "criminal" cases. A civil case is another way of referring to a private case or "suit" -- that is, where someone sues someone else. A criminal case involves a prosecution by the Crown under a public law statute such as the Criminal Code, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act or the Competition Act. I hope that answer your question.
It depends on the context. In the civil side, the parties decide whether to settle or try the case. In criminal cases, the prosecution has to decide whether to prosecute. The defense then decides whether to plead guilty or have a trial.
In a civil case, the jury decides whether the defendant is liable or not liable for the alleged harm or wrongdoing. In a criminal case, the jury decides whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty of committing a crime. The standard of proof is higher in a criminal case (beyond a reasonable doubt) compared to a civil case (preponderance of the evidence).
There are both civil fraud and criminal fraud statutes. It depends on what the IRS decides to pursue.
It is a criminal case.
It could be one of each depending on whether the prosecutor decides to prosecute the criminal case and whether the family decide to pursue the civil case. Remember there were both a criminal and a civil case in the O.J. Simpson trial. He was found not guilty on the criminal case (beyond a reasonable doubt) but guilty on the civil one (preponderance of the evidence).
Civil
One key difference between a criminal case and a civil case is that in a criminal case, the government prosecutes the defendant for violating a law, while in a civil case, individuals or entities sue each other for damages or to enforce a legal right.
Yes, a person can still sue in a civil court even if they plead guilty in a criminal case. A guilty plea in a criminal case does not prevent the individual from pursuing a civil lawsuit related to the same incident. However, the outcome of the criminal case, such as a conviction, may affect the civil case, as the guilty plea can be used as evidence in the civil proceedings.
theft is generally regarded as a criminal case but if the victim who was stolen from wishes to take action to recover the losses, then it will be a civil case as well
The question makes no sense. A "charge" refers to a criminal charge. A civil case refers to a case that is not criminal.
Unlike the arson case, which was a criminal case, Aaron's divorce action was a civil case.
The municipal court case can be either civil or criminal, depending on the nature of the legal issue being addressed.
If there are, in fact, both a criminal and a civil side to the incident, the criminal aspect will be handled first. The "state's" (i.e.: the "people's") interests in prosecuting a crime take precedence over the civil wrong against an individual. (Think the O.J. Simpson case.) Traditionally, the criminal matter will be decided first. This is primarily because proceeding with the civil case can prejudice a criminal defendant's rights. The civil case will wind up stalled because the criminal defendant can refuse to comply with civil discovery by asserting the right to remain silent. Admissions or statements given in a civil case could be employed against the criminal defendant. As a practical matter the civil case cannot proceed until there is a resolution of the criminal matter. For further information see the related links below.