If you are being deposed by opposing counsel strictly for factual material (which they will inevitably use to try to impeach your testimony) these depositions are held at the attorney's convenience.
There is no 'set' order, and many cases do not even require depositions. Depositions are a poor second choice to actual in-person testimony, and are only allowed to be admissable for limited reasons.
Under both contributory and comparative negligence, the negligence of the defendant is not in doubt; it has been proved by the plaintiff. The basic difference between the two concepts is that comparative negligence attempts to compensate the plaintiff for some portion of her injuries, no matter how small, where as contributory negligence serves to bar completely a damage award for injury.
No, the bond money was posted to ensure and guarantee the defendant's appearance at subsequent court hearings. The defendant failed to appear and went on the run, becoming a fugitive from justice. Only if the bail bondsman HIMSELF captured and delivered the fugitive to court will the money be returned to him. If the fugitive was captured solely by law enforcement it has no effect on the bond forfeiture.
A delinquent.
The amount a judge on "People's Court" gets paid can vary, but typically judges on television court shows receive a daily rate or annual salary. The exact figure is usually not disclosed to the public.
First call credit card companies and report the incedent. Call the police to check with them. Try to remember any comprimising items you may have had in there like a check, driver's license etc. and figure each out.
The plaintiff is the person who brings or files the suit. The person who gets sued is the respondent or defendant .
Case gets thrown out.
When a person (the plaintiff) sues someone (the defendant), the defendant gets a certain amount of time to respond to the lawsuit (times vary by state). If the defendant does not respond to the lawsuit within the time period prescribed or does not show up to court on the day he or she is supposed to, the plaintiff will ask for (and the court will usually give) a default judgment. Simply put, the plaintiff wins because the defendant did not make an effort to defend themselves. A request for entry of default is when the time has passed for the defendant to respond to a lawsuit and the plaintiff is asking for a default judgment. This only applies to civil cases, not criminal cases.
The court can rule in favor of the plaintiff. This is not an unusual occurrence. The plaintiff usually gets everything they asked for, which may be money, injunctions and compensation for court costs.
When the plaintiff files a civil suit they usually give the defendant a chance to settlement, which notifies them that they're being used and gives them the chance to hire legal representation who will advise them whether or not to settle. On top of this, if the defendant decides not to settle, the plaintiff then sends a writ to the court to notify them that they are bringing a civil case, this document also gets sent to the defendant
Assuming you mean litigation and not clothing, yes. If you are the plaintiff, the trustee may take the case over from your attorney and the proceeds if any. If you are the defendant, the case stops unless the plaintiff files and gets relief from stay.
When Judge Judy decides there's no case from either party's claim/dispute, she will drop the case (occasionally with no prejudice) and no one--plaintiff and defendant--is paid.
No. Only the Defendant has the right to remove. If the P wants to file the case in a federal court, they could have to get the case dismissed and re-file the case in the federal court. Plaintiff gets choice of forum, so if he wanted federal court, he should've filed it there initially.
The government may only exercise its authority over cases that involve protecting public interest. In civil cases, the public does not have any (objective) interest or benefit in the outcome of the case.When a plaintiff "sues" a defendant, the plaintiff is requesting the government's support or advice, and the plaintiff is signing a contract that they will abide by the judge's ruling.
The jury does not decide what punishment the defendant gets, the judge does. The only thing the jury decides is whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty of what he is accused of.
Under both contributory and comparative negligence, the negligence of the defendant is not in doubt; it has been proved by the plaintiff. The basic difference between the two concepts is that comparative negligence attempts to compensate the plaintiff for some portion of her injuries, no matter how small, where as contributory negligence serves to bar completely a damage award for injury.
That normally means the plaintiff asked the judge for a judgment against you not on the facts of the case but just because you're in default (for failure to appear, plead, answer, or do something else you're supposed to do as a defendant in litigation wherever you are). And apparently the judge said no, and either the law required that notice be sent to you or the judge in his or her discretion ordered that notice be sent to you. So right now there's no judgment against you -- yet. The next step if you do nothing but continue to receive court notices and you do not respond, may be for the plaintiff to ask the judge for a trial date where the plaintiff puts on its witnesses and evidence and if you are given notice to the trial and don't show up the judge could enter a judgment against you "ex parte" (one-sided) and then it just gets more difficult to undo anything.