"Common Law" is the evolution of a consensus of opinion within a court system, especially by the higher courts, on the acceptance of a legal rule or doctrine. "English Common Law" is created by the traditions and precedents followed by the English Courts. In the U.S., since our legal system grew out of the English legal system, our Common Law is very similar to English Common Law, but is modified to reflect our own, American, values and traditions.
Common Law basically looks at how previous courts have ruled on the same or similar issue and then rules the same way, so long as the facts are the same or similar enough. This is the concept of 'Stare Decisis' or 'Precedent'. It is based on values of consistancy and impartiality. People need to have some idea of what to expect the court to do in similar situations, and if the court rules one way for person 'A' then it should be expected to treat person 'B' the same way. Articulating a particular legal rule or doctrine in Common Law can often be difficult since different courts may describe or word a rule differently, and, since Common Law evolves and is often 'tweeked' by individual courts to fit their facts or idea of a just outcome in their case, a Common Law rule can change over time and in different jurisdictions.
Common Law rules are best seen as generalized objective rules and not as specific, subjective rules since each case is different and the rule may not apply well to the facts of the individual case.
This brings up another aspect of Common Law, in that, as it is said that for every rule there is an exception, in Common Law certain facts in a particular case can be used to distinguish that case from previous cases to which the rule has been applied and thus make the rule not apply to the current case. In law, facts matter, and different facts can allow a judge or attorney to argue that a Common Law rule does not apply or should give a different result given the specific fact pattern.
One final aspect of Common Law I'll mention is the concept of "Controlling" law. Court systems follow heirarchies and divisions of jurisdiction, like the difference between Federal and State courts. Decisions by higher courts, like the Supreme Court, are "Controlling Law" over lower courts within their jurisdiction; meaning that decisions in lower courts are 'controlled' by or should follow the rules set down by the higher court. The highest court in an individual State makes Controlling law for the lower courts in that state. Decisions by courts in one State do not control decisions of courts in another. Controlling Law can get very confusing because a lot depends on what kind of law the case involves, whether it be State or Federal law, or a statute or a Common Law issue.
The two main systems of law in use today are civil law and common law. Civil law is based on a codified set of laws and emphasizes the principles of legal codes and statutes. Common law, on the other hand, relies on judicial decisions and precedents to establish legal principles.
The roots of US law can be traced back to multiple sources, including English common law, the European legal tradition, and the principles of the Enlightenment. In particular, English common law principles such as the rule of law, trial by jury, and the protection of individual rights have had a significant influence on the development of US legal system.
Common law predates statute law in the English legal system because it evolved gradually through judicial decisions rather than through legislative enactments. It was initially based on customs and traditions established by judges over time. Statute law was introduced later to codify and supplement common law, but common law principles still form the basis of the legal system.
The primary achievement of the English Common Law system is the development of a comprehensive framework of legal principles and precedents that have been refined over centuries through judicial decisions. This system established the principles of justice, fairness, and consistency in legal proceedings, which have influenced legal systems around the world.
When the U.S. became independent it "received" the English Common Law system and built upon it. Since your question specified the 1600's the people in the American colonies would have been subject to English Common Law.
US common law formed from English common law
US common law formed from English common law.
The US did adopt the English Common Law, the only state that does not have the English Common Law is Louisiana.
US common law formed from English common law
The English Common Law was important in the development of the American System of Criminal Justice System. Th English Common Law was chosen by the judges and courts. The English Common Law provides presidential weight on the common law and requires that all acts committed be treated the same and not different on different occasions.
Its foundation is based not on English common law but on Roman Law and a mixture of French, German and Spanish law instead.
english common law
This called the "common law".
No, the basis of US law is the English common law.
Common law is developed through judicial decisions and opinions in court cases rather than through legislation.
English common law & the Roman Civil law
English Common Law