answersLogoWhite

0

because he later on noticed that most of his slaves had vanished

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Law

Who is a slave who sued for his freedom after being taken into free territory by owner?

Dred Scott, a slave, sued for his freedom after being taken by his owner to free territories. The landmark Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) ruled that even though Scott was in a free territory, he was not entitled to freedom because he was property under the law.


How do you use the word slave in a sentence?

People bought and sold slaves to work on large plantations. You sir are my slave. That would be a good sentance


What were the slaves consequences?

The consequences of being a slave could be, being taken away from your family at any time. Then can be taken to a different place to farm. You could also be captured or sold at any time. A consequence and/or punishment would be that if you "misbehave" or make your slave owner mad, you can be whipped or beaten. some slaves turn out somewhat lucky because they are with a nicer slave owner that doesn't work them as hard, or gives them a little easier jobs.


What did they do with the slaves from the slave ships when they lsnded and how did they sell the slaves?

When slaves were brought ashore from slave ships, they were usually inspected, cleaned, and separated before being sold at auctions. The slaves were then auctioned off to the highest bidder, typically plantation owners or slave traders, who would then use them for labor in fields, mines, or households.


Who is a Spanish slave ship taken over by the slaves it was transporting?

The Amistad was a Spanish slave ship that was overtaken by the African captives aboard in 1839. The ship was eventually intercepted by the US Navy and the Africans were taken into custody in Connecticut, sparking a legal battle over whether they were considered property or free individuals.

Related Questions

Why did Tice Davids' think his slave must have taken an underground road?

because he later on noticed that most of his slaves had vanished


How did the underground railroads get its name?

The underground railroad actually got its name when a slave named Tice Davids escaped from Kentucky in 1831 and swam across the Ohio River to freedom in Ripley, Ohio. According to legend, Davids' owner was chasing him in a boat when he lost sight of his swimming slave. The owner thought Davids must have taken an 'underground railroad'. That comment was reported in the press, and the term has been used ever since.The underground railroad was named for the slaves' method of escape to freedom. "Underground" means the movement was secret and intentionally took place below the awareness of public officials and most members of society. The "railroad" designation took its name from the code for safe houses, which were called "stations" or "depots," and the participating abolitionists, who were called "station masters."In many respects, the underground railroad resembled a real railroad operation in that there were fixed routes, conductors, stations or depots, and a final destination.It was referred to as "underground" because it was considered to be (intentionally) obscured; "travelers" spent time at "stations", also known as "safe houses", under the watchful care of "Conductors" who assisted escaped slaves despite the considerable risks to their own life and limb.See more information at the related Wikipedia link listed below:


How did the underground get it name?

The underground railroad actually got its name when a slave named Tice Davids escaped from Kentucky in 1831 and swam across the Ohio River to freedom in Ripley, Ohio. According to legend, Davids' owner was chasing him in a boat when he lost sight of his swimming slave. The owner thought Davids must have taken an 'underground railroad'. That comment was reported in the press, and the term has been used ever since.The underground railroad was named for the slaves' method of escape to freedom. "Underground" means the movement was secret and intentionally took place below the awareness of public officials and most members of society. The "railroad" designation took its name from the code for safe houses, which were called "stations" or "depots," and the participating abolitionists, who were called "station masters."In many respects, the underground railroad resembled a real railroad operation in that there were fixed routes, conductors, stations or depots, and a final destination.It was referred to as "underground" because it was considered to be (intentionally) obscured; "travelers" spent time at "stations", also known as "safe houses", under the watchful care of "Conductors" who assisted escaped slaves despite the considerable risks to their own life and limb.See more information at the related Wikipedia link listed below:


How the underground railroad get it name?

The underground railroad actually got its name when a slave named Tice Davids escaped from Kentucky in 1831 and swam across the Ohio River to freedom in Ripley, Ohio. According to legend, Davids' owner was chasing him in a boat when he lost sight of his swimming slave. The owner thought Davids must have taken an 'underground railroad'. That comment was reported in the press, and the term has been used ever since.The underground railroad was named for the slaves' method of escape to freedom. "Underground" means the movement was secret and intentionally took place below the awareness of public officials and most members of society. The "railroad" designation took its name from the code for safe houses, which were called "stations" or "depots," and the participating abolitionists, who were called "station masters."In many respects, the underground railroad resembled a real railroad operation in that there were fixed routes, conductors, stations or depots, and a final destination.It was referred to as "underground" because it was considered to be (intentionally) obscured; "travelers" spent time at "stations", also known as "safe houses", under the watchful care of "Conductors" who assisted escaped slaves despite the considerable risks to their own life and limb.See more information at the related Wikipedia link listed below:


Slave who sued for his freedom after being taken into free territory by owner?

Dred Scott


What happened to babies if they were born by a slave?

They became property of the slave owner. Once they had grown enough to do work, they would be put to work like any other slave. They also were taken from their mother.


Where were slaves taken and how?

It really depends on where the slaves were from. Some slaves were forced to move to a different country by their owner, but some escaped by the underground railroad.


What were the consequence?

The consequences of being a slave could be, being taken away from your family at any time. Then can be taken to a different place to farm. You could also be captured or sold at any time. A consequence and/or punishment would be that if you "misbehave" or make your slave owner mad, you can be whipped or beaten. some slaves turn out somewhat lucky because they are with a nicer slave owner that doesn't work them as hard, or gives them a little easier jobs.


Who is a slave who sued for his freedom after being taken into free territory by owner?

Dred Scott, a slave, sued for his freedom after being taken by his owner to free territories. The landmark Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) ruled that even though Scott was in a free territory, he was not entitled to freedom because he was property under the law.


How many slave were taken from kenya?

Thousands of slaves were taken from Kenya and put into the slave trade. They were taken from countries all over Africa and forced into slavery.


Why was dred Scott vs sandford important?

It was important because it made clear that property couldn't sue its owner and that property , in this case a slave, can be taken to free territory and still being property because a owner can take its property wherever they want.


How did taney justify his position that The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutionsl in the case of dred vs Sanford?

He simply interpreted the Constitution in the spirit in which it had originally been written - by slave-owner Thomas Jefferson. So a man's right to property was taken to include slave-property.