is it not to have political competation
what can be a dialogue for a lawyer in fancy dress competition for children9
Rockefeller and Vanderbilt used their wealth and influence to lobby for changes in laws that would benefit their business interests, such as regulations on competition and transportation. They also made significant contributions to political campaigns and parties to ensure favorable legislation was passed.
Studying competition law is crucial now to promote fair market competition, prevent monopolistic practices, protect consumers from price manipulation, and foster innovation. In today's global economy, understanding competition law ensures businesses comply with regulations and contributes to a level playing field for all market participants.
Northerners feared that southern slave owners would expand slavery into new territories, leading to political and economic conflicts. They were also concerned about the influence of pro-slavery forces in the national government and the potential spread of slave labor competition in free states.
The statutory requirement that ensures full and open competition for government acquisitions is the Competition in Contracting Act (CICA). This act requires federal agencies to obtain full and open competition in their acquisitions, ensuring fair and equitable opportunities for all potential vendors to compete for government contracts.
yes, it is good to have political competitions because if their will be no political competitions then the elected members will not full fill there promises and work according to there needs
it is bad because in this so many dirty tricks are used to win the vote. even the good leaders are never come to this competition.
poltical compptetion helpps to force poltical paries and leaders to serve people...
the only one National Progressive Dravidian Federation(Desiya murpokku Diravida Kazhagam - DMDK) is a good compitotor with DMK & ADMK.
Elections are all about political competitions. If there is no competition the election will become pointless . There are some merits and demerits.Some Merits are:☻It is good to have a political competition because it gives the voters the full right to elect their own candidates.☻If there is not competition and there is only one political party then it is Dictatorship, like Nazis in Germany, Baath party in Iraq, or Musharraf in Pakistan.☻In the next election, parties can prove that are better than the previous party.Some Demerits are:☻it creates a sense of disunity and factionalism in every locality.☻Different political parties and leaders often level allegation against one another.☻Parties/candidates often use dirty tricks to win elections.☻Pressure to win electoral fights does not allow sensible long term policies to be formulated.☻Some good people who may wish to serve the country do not enter this arena. They do not like the idea of being dragged into unhealthy competition.
sapsasa is a good competition.
legal political economic social technological competition
The promotion of economic competitiveness and competition as a political priority in response to globalization's lowering of economic borders between countries.
Prejudice against immigrants can be caused by fear of the unknown, competition for jobs or resources, cultural differences, and misinformation or stereotypes perpetuated by the media or political leaders. Additionally, economic downturns or political rhetoric can also fuel prejudice against immigrants.
A need for cheap labor, Economic competition w/ nations & political/military competition with other nations spurred US imperialism
All competition is good.
No, we haven't good political parties.