cause they pay alot to not get in trouble, I got a great example
A dude that has a momma who runs a bank gets at first 3 felonies and 2 misdemeanors, with rich lawyer by his side got dropped to 2 probationable felonies. Then violates his probation and cathes a new felony case, rich guy's lawyer gets him reinstated to probation and has a clause in plea agreement for new case that the state cannot object for probation. Rich guy then get violated once again with new case finally mommy's money didn't save him for the inevitable but since she's high school chums with the director of prisons he will be let out early, personal expierence, my husband
Rich people may have more resources to hire skilled lawyers and navigate the legal system, which can lead to reduced consequences or even avoidance of punishment. Additionally, their social status and connections may influence how their cases are handled. Corruption and bias within the legal system can also play a role in allowing wealthy individuals to escape accountability for their actions.
Macavity is breaking the law of theft due to his reputation as a notorious cat burglar in the poem "Macavity: The Mystery Cat" by T.S. Eliot.
A violation or infraction of the law refers to breaking a legal rule or obligation set by a governing body. It can result in penalties or consequences such as fines, probation, or imprisonment, depending on the severity of the violation and the legal framework in place.
what would happen if aorganistion breaks the law codes
Some people view illegal immigration as breaking the law, which is why they may treat illegal immigrants as criminals. There is also a belief that illegal immigrants are taking jobs and resources away from citizens, leading to negative perceptions. Additionally, there can be fear and misinformation surrounding immigration, further fueling negative attitudes towards illegal immigrants.
Basically, the difference is your motivation. Breaking an 'unjust' law is called civil disobedience, and some very brave and principled people have done this to the benefit of us all. I put quotes around the word unjust because there is necessarily a personal judgement about whether or not a law is 'just'. In some cases it may seem obvious, like the heroic defiance of Rosa Parks. In some cases, an individual or a small number of people may be more interested in the fact that a law is simply inconvenient to them and is not necessarily unjust. In democracies, society as a whole determines what kind of laws will hold, and it is the nature of law that the actions of people will be restricted from time to time in order to bring about the greater good. In either case, someone engaging in civil disobedience will have to accept ahead of time the consequences of violating the law, and even correct civil disobedience will not always produce the desired result quickly.So someone engaging in civil disobedience is doing so because of a real conviction that a law is itself harmful to everyone. A person just defying the law is interested in self-gain without regard for the people as a whole.
people start breaking it
civil disobedience
civil disobedience
Restaurants are not breaking the law by not giving tap water. They have the right to refuse service and to dictate which products they sell or give away within lawful parameters.
Your question is impossible to answer. Only those people that are CAUGHT breaking laws are recorded.
Yes, If they're convicted of breaking the law.
Yes it is. God does not what you to run a way and that would be breaking the ten commandments and the law.
Breaking the Law was created in 1980-01.
People convicted in a court of law in the USA of breaking laws are called criminals.
For the average Roman the law meant punishment for crime or transgression of rules or a channel for litigation. Roman punishments were very harsh and hit particularly average people and the poor. Rich people got away with just a fine.
For the average Roman the law meant punishment for crime or transgression of rules or a channel for litigation. Roman punishments were very harsh and hit particularly average people and the poor. Rich people got away with just a fine.
For the average Roman the law meant punishment for crime or transgression of rules or a channel for litigation. Roman punishments were very harsh and hit particularly average people and the poor. Rich people got away with just a fine.