Sharecropping was a legal practice after the Civil War because it provided a way for former slaves and poor whites to work the land without having to own it. Landowners would allow tenants to use their land in exchange for a percentage of the crops grown. This system perpetuated a cycle of debt and poverty for the sharecroppers.
Sharecropping itself is not illegal, but the exploitative practices often associated with it can be illegal, such as unfair land rental agreements or poor labor conditions. Some countries have laws regulating agricultural arrangements like sharecropping to protect the rights of tenants and prevent exploitation.
Sharecropping and tenant farming are both arrangements where individuals work on a landowner's land in exchange for a portion of the crops grown. However, in sharecropping, the laborer typically provides their own tools and supplies, while in tenant farming, the landowner often provides these resources.
sharecropping
Freedmen often resorted to sharecropping due to limited access to land and resources after being emancipated. Sharecropping provided them with a way to earn a living when they had little else to start with.
In a sharecropping agreement, the person who owns the land typically offers the worker a piece of land to cultivate in exchange for a portion of the crop produced. The landowner may also provide tools, seed, and sometimes housing to the worker.
The families lived on sharecropping land
sharecropping affected African Americans and poor whites.
Cesar had done sharecropping with his neighbor's.
sharecropping=)
Sharecropping
There is no antonym for sharecropping as far as I know.
You
They were allowed to have part of the final crop, hence the name sharecropping.
Sharecropping was used to keep the land owner in wealth and have workers but still with little pay.
sharecropping did not cause the civil war but it happened after when they couldnt have slaves anymore
Slavery is illegal in the terms it was used in the 1800's in the United States. Slavery is still alive in some African countries as well as parts of Asia. The people who are engaged in sharecropping always have the choice to leave the farm and go somewhere else. Slaves don't. Modern sharecropping is also under the control of a mutually-agreed-upon contract which spells out the responsibilities and benefits to both parties which can be enforced by a court of law. Sharecropping you are not forced to live at the place you are. Slavery you are forced by your will to work. Sharecropping you have to pick stuff from other peoples land in which you are living on. You give the landowners how ever much they want. In slavery you are not allowed to keep anything.
Sharecropping benefited both the workers and the owners. Sharecropping involved tenants farming land that is owned by someone else in return for a share of the crops.