It sounds confusing, but that's because "been" is a past tense verb.
Just remember that "has" is present tense and "had" is past tense. Only use "had" when referring to a specific time prior to now.
For example:
"It has been an awful hot day, today." (this is about something in the past)
"It had been an awful hot day, yesterday."
Another answerBeen is the past participle. The past tense forms of be are was and were. The past participle is used to make perfect verb tenses (have been and had been) and passive verb phrases.
Has been is present perfect and had been is past perfect .
The main uses of Present perfect are to talk about:
* some thing that begun in the past and hasn't changed eg
I have studied English since I was in High School.
* a general experience eg
She has been to the Louvre.
* recent events or states eg
She has been to the cinema this morning.
The main use of past perfect is:
* to show that one thing happened in the past before another thing in the past. eg
Jack died after he had been in prison for ten years.
"Has been" is present perfect tense, indicating an action that started in the past and continues into the present. "Was been" is not a correct verb phrase in English.
There is a type of puzzle named spot the difference
The main difference between the two products is their ingredients.
been there focus on destination. gone there focus on the trip.
The difference between the two options refers to the distinctions or variations between the choices being compared.
Much the same as the difference between to and in.
one has been on the end
had been is before and was is just there
The difference between the 1938, 1959 and 1952 is that it has been progressively modernized.
The difference is that "has been" is grammatically correct. "Is been" does not work because "been" refers to the past while "is" refers to the present. "Has been" works because both "has" and "been" agree in tense.
"could" asumes it may have, "would" asumes it was.
"TO" means to go to, to see. "IN" means to take part in, be part of
You have been walking is present tense and you walked is past
The grease
There is no difference. Both have been ordained. However, there is a difference between a priest or monk who has been sanctioned to teach and one who hasn't. It's possible to call those who have been sanctioned to teach "priests" and those who haven't "monks." .
No difference. They both have not been fined by fish scales or dairy products.
There is structural difference between xylem and phloem. This is because their function is also different. Had there been no difference in structure, how these could have performed different function?