Please specify the context of the sentence. :)
However, if you mean as in:
-She had told him she loved him.
-They had said it was okay.
-She had said she was lost.
.Andrew told Arthur he had always envied him.
Those are a few examples of when you can use the word said or tell without having to use the word that before the predicate. Actually, using the word that is more of an optional choice than rule. I would actually recommend not using it a lot because it can become a habit of speech in which you tend to use the same word over and over in unnecessary repetition. This could distract readers and listeners instead of gaining their attention. I recommend, therefore, that you avoid using the word that after the word say or tell, for it will make you lose emphasis and people will lose interest.
I'm an English teacher in the UK, so if you wish to ask me anything else please do at the following email:
emily.lawrence88@gmail.com
Also if you find yourself in the need of more English grammar lessons I'll be glad to negotiate tutoring. I'll be delighted to hear from you.
Farewell,
Emily
When in doubt, use the word 'that'. It is usually never wrong to include the word 'that' after 'she said'. However, in a lot of cases, 'that' can be omitted and the sentence will not loose it's meaning.That means the following two sentences would have the same meaning:1. She said that she was tired.2. She said she was tired.Reference: http:/web.ku.edu/~edit/that.html
The adverb for the word 'said' is 'saidly'.
The word "said" can be rearranged to spell one other word.You can spell the word aids.
Not necessarily. There is no word or phrase in English that requires a comma.
"My doctor said that my next appointment is at 4:30 Tuesday."
She said you were a good friend.
If you want a word besides SAID, you can use the word announce. You could also use told or state.
said is a better word. ))
the angrily boy said a bad word.
Said.
you said you didn't go ,Or did you?
When in doubt, use the word 'that'. It is usually never wrong to include the word 'that' after 'she said'. However, in a lot of cases, 'that' can be omitted and the sentence will not loose it's meaning.That means the following two sentences would have the same meaning:1. She said that she was tired.2. She said she was tired.Reference: http:/web.ku.edu/~edit/that.html
No. First, exasperated does not mean "said" -- exasperated is an adjective meaning frustrated. Second, quit looking for fancy schmancy ways of saying "said." Just use "said" and it will be fine. If you have the characters talking back and forth, you don't even need to use "said" except in a few places.
he said no in a dissident tone.
He said, "Ephphatha" in Aramaic.
"Who said they're related to you?"
"Why did you take my English Book? I said I still needed it to do my homework!""I don't understand grammar," he said.