history is normally written down an d oral tradition isn't
When no written record is available, we must rely on the oral tradition.
An oral source refers to information that is transmitted verbally from one person to another. This information is typically shared through spoken communication rather than written documents or other forms of written media. Oral sources can include interviews, conversations, speeches, and personal accounts.
An example of oral tradition is the passing down of stories, myths, or histories from one generation to the next through spoken word rather than written text. This can include cultural practices, songs, folklore, or legends that are transmitted orally within a community.
oral tradition may vary its information from teller to tellerits not being remembered for so longit has its limited scopeoral tradition is important in all societies despite of the reliance of some culture on written records and accounts.oral tradition are highly structured and are recording and passing on experience which oral tradition can carry from person to person variation are also open to contradiction in the same ways that written account are in this way, the force of oral tradition can continue through generation to generation although small details in the telling may change. oral history cannot be seen as merely something that we turn to when written records are not available very often issues of local knowledge of agrarian traditions.Tarundeep Singh#+919818532035Oral tradition, while an important part of many cultures, is less reliable than the written word. It is often subjective and reflects the opinion of the storyteller. It can be compared to the children's game of *telephone* where you have a large circle of people and the first person tells the second person something, then the second person tells the third person the same thing until you get to the last person. By that time, the original message was probably changed drastically so that it ends up being totally different.
Yes, you can use oral tradition in a sentence such as "The African tribes use oral tradition to tell stories abut their past."
history is normally written down and oral tradition isn't.
Oral Tradition. They first spread the word and then they started to write it down.
written tradition
The opposite of oral tradition is written tradition, where knowledge, stories, and information are recorded and transmitted through written documents instead of being passed down through spoken word.
Mark Amodio has written: 'Writing the oral tradition' -- subject(s): English poetry, History, History and criticism, Oral communication, Oral tradition, Oral-formulaic analysis, Written communication
When no written record is available, we must rely on the oral tradition.
That is called oral tradition.
Oral
They often take years to fine-tune.
Oral Tradition is important because people didn't have written records people passed down stories from generation to generation
Samuel Byrskog (Story as History) says writing was usually seen as supplementary to oral discourse and that it functioned as a memorandum of what the person already should remember from oral communication. Written tradition would then be the natural evolution of the oral tradition. Just as oral traditions (stories) changed from community to community so then the written tradition would follow.
The West African oral tradition can be different from written tradition because they never had a written language. Also they had storytellers that told West African traditions.It also may be different in similarity to the original. In oral traditions the stories are often altered by the person relaying the information, and traditions change slightly that way.