The given sentence is not correct: It should probably read, "What did your last slave die from?", with no "d" on "die". The compound verb form is "did ... die", which was formally named the "intensive past tense" when I was young. In practice, it might as well be called the "interrogative past tense", since it is primarily used to ask questions by separating the two words of the compound verb. However, the tense is also used for emphasis with normal word order, as in, "The mistreated slave did die, even though his rescuers gave him the best medical treatment available."
Whatever the name of the tense, it is formed by combining the auxiliary verb "do", properly inflected for the tense to be intensified, in this instance "did" for the past tense, with the infinitive form of the verb to be intensified, not the past participle of that verb as in the given sentence.
Formal style would also call for the word order to be changed to "From what did your last slave die?", to avoid ending with a preposition.
Yes, "similar to" is grammatically correct and commonly used to show a comparison between two things that are alike. For example: "This dress is similar to the one she wore last week."
No, it is not correct to say "Are you going to the park or no." It would be more grammatically correct to say "Are you going to the park or not?"
'Since the last ten years...' is correct, but is only part of a sentence.
In some varieties, the past tense form is used as a past participle, in place of the different past participle which is used in standard varieties. So this example may be used in some dialects, but it is not grammatical in standard English.
If talking about a Co as in a Company, a period will suffice.
The correct grammar usage here would be: He and I went to the movies last night.
No. That would be "I sang to the baby last night."
Yes, "similar to" is grammatically correct and commonly used to show a comparison between two things that are alike. For example: "This dress is similar to the one she wore last week."
No, it is not correct to say "Are you going to the park or no." It would be more grammatically correct to say "Are you going to the park or not?"
"You could not have been" is grammatically correct. "You could not have been at the cinema last night, because I saw you in the park."
'Since the last ten years...' is correct, but is only part of a sentence.
That depends on when you use "I am." It's kind of correct to use "I am" as the only words in a sentence if someone asks if you are doing something. It's also grammatically correct to say "I am" after the relative prounoun what. For example, both "You are turning into what I am," and "I am what I am," are grammatically correct.
Yes, the formal and grammatically correct way of addressing yourself and another person is to put yourself last.
In some varieties, the past tense form is used as a past participle, in place of the different past participle which is used in standard varieties. So this example may be used in some dialects, but it is not grammatical in standard English.
The correct phrase is "while stocks last." It indicates that an offer or item is available only as long as the inventory is not depleted. Using "until stock last" is grammatically incorrect. Always opt for "while stocks last" to convey the intended meaning accurately.
How long did the European Slave Trade last?
no. so and so lived in where ever new york. (period) They moved last year. no. so and so lived in where ever new york. (period) They moved last year.