0
What else can I help you with?
Which is grammatically correct regardless or irregardless?
'Regardless' is grammatically correct. It means 'without having regard' ('regard-less'). By putting 'ir' in front of it you reverse its meaning and end up with a 'word' which, if it actually existed, would mean 'not without having regard', or, put more simply, 'having regard'. Both the prefix 'ir' and the suffix 'less' serve to reverse the meaning of the root word, so used together they merely cancel each other out. 'Irregardless' is, unfortunately, a common error and results from not thinking about the meaning of what you write. Compare 'irrespective', which also means 'without having regard' ('ir-respective'). You need only one element to reverse the meaning of the root word. You would not write 'irrespectiveless'! It may be that English speakers do not like variety of expression. Certainly, many English speakers confuse similar expressions, mixing them up and cramming them together. There is a word: irregarding, which some confuse with the word regardless, creating the monster "irregardless." Another example is : cannot help but love you ( a confusion of cannot help loving you and cannot but love you) There's certainly no word 'irregarding' in any version of the English language that I am aware of.
Which is correct the missed boy or the missing boy?
The missing boy is correct. "Missing" is typically used to describe a person who cannot be found, while "missed" is used to convey the feeling of longing for someone's presence.
What is the present tense of 'versus' your daughter likes to ask Who are you 'versing' today This cannot be correct?
The correct present tense form of "versus" is still "versus." In informal language, it is common to hear "versing" as slang for competing against someone, but it is not grammatically correct. Your daughter might be using it in this informal way.
Which is grammatically correct - 'She speaks very loudly' or 'She speaks loud'?
She speaks very loudly.Speaks is a verb, and you want to describe how she speaks, so you need to use an adverb.Loudly is an adverb. (Many adverbs end on -ly eg. softly, stupidly, quickly)You cannot use loud, as loud is an adjective, and adjectives can only be used to describe a noun. eg. Turn off that loud music. He was playing his loud guitar.
How do you write can not in past tense?
The past tense of cannot is couldn't!!!
Is everything seems to be in despair between us grammatically correct?
It is grammatically correct, but not good English because things cannot be in despair. Use "desperate."
He concurs this book is good Is this grammatically correct?
The sentence: "He concurs this book is good." is not grammatically correct. Alternatives include "He concurs; this book is good." or "He concurs that this book is good." A sentence cannot have two verb-subject pairs without some kind of conjunction.
Is it grammatically correct to start a sentence with but?
Yes. There is no word that cannot begin an English sentence. But that does not mean that it is always a good way to begin one.
Can you start a sentence with able to?
I cannot come up with one that would be a complete, grammatically correct sentence.Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound, Superman amused the citizens of Metropolis with his acrobatic skills.
Which is grammatically correct regardless or irregardless?
'Regardless' is grammatically correct. It means 'without having regard' ('regard-less'). By putting 'ir' in front of it you reverse its meaning and end up with a 'word' which, if it actually existed, would mean 'not without having regard', or, put more simply, 'having regard'. Both the prefix 'ir' and the suffix 'less' serve to reverse the meaning of the root word, so used together they merely cancel each other out. 'Irregardless' is, unfortunately, a common error and results from not thinking about the meaning of what you write. Compare 'irrespective', which also means 'without having regard' ('ir-respective'). You need only one element to reverse the meaning of the root word. You would not write 'irrespectiveless'! It may be that English speakers do not like variety of expression. Certainly, many English speakers confuse similar expressions, mixing them up and cramming them together. There is a word: irregarding, which some confuse with the word regardless, creating the monster "irregardless." Another example is : cannot help but love you ( a confusion of cannot help loving you and cannot but love you) There's certainly no word 'irregarding' in any version of the English language that I am aware of.
Can a grammatically correct sentence end with the word the?
Only in one context, which is seen in the question: you used "the" as a noun exemplar of "the word" and the object of analysis, and not as a grammatical component of the sentence. When used as an article, "the" cannot appear at the end of a sentence.
Which is correct the missed boy or the missing boy?
The missing boy is correct. "Missing" is typically used to describe a person who cannot be found, while "missed" is used to convey the feeling of longing for someone's presence.
Is it grammatically correct to say you will get look into it?
No. You can say that you will look into something, or that you will get someone to look into something, but you cannot say 'get look'. These are all correct: 'I will look into your problem with the leaking washing machine tomorrow.' 'I will get a plumber to look into your problem with the leaking washing machine tomorrow.' 'I will get your problem with the leaking washing machine looked into tomorrow.'
Are more greater and much more greater grammatically correct?
"More greater" is not grammatically correct because "greater" already implies a comparison, so adding "more" is redundant. Similarly, "much more greater" is also incorrect because "much" and "more" are both comparative terms. It would be more appropriate to simply use "greater" or "much greater" to convey the desired comparison in a grammatically correct manner.
Does ham is curing or pickling?
This is a grammatically incorrect sentence and cannot be answered as written. Please reword and resubmit.
Why tall URL can not valid and can not loaded?
This question does not make sense at all, grammatically, and therefore cannot be answered.
What is the present tense of 'versus' your daughter likes to ask Who are you 'versing' today This cannot be correct?
The correct present tense form of "versus" is still "versus." In informal language, it is common to hear "versing" as slang for competing against someone, but it is not grammatically correct. Your daughter might be using it in this informal way.
