Age of Sanskrit and Tamil
*Classical Sanskrit (defined by Panini's grammar, ca. 4th BC)
*Classical Tamil (Sangam literature ca. 10th BC or 3rd BC to 4th AD, defined by Tolkappiyam)
From this its hard to find the exact age of both languages. But they are not related. Tamil is Dravidian language and Sanskrit is Indo-Aryan language. But it is clear that Tamil and Sanskrit has their own grammar to sustain independently unlike other Indian languages. Many scholars claim Tamil predates Sanskrit.
SOURCES :
* Encyclopedia Britannica (2008), "Sanskrit literature", Quote: "Two main periods in the development of the literature are discernible: the Vedic period, approximately 1500-200 BC; and, somewhat overlapping it, the classical period, approximately 500 BC-AD 1000."
*Article "Panini" fromThe Columbia Encyclopedia (Sixth Edition. 2001-07) at Bartleby.com
* Zvelebil, Kamil (1997), The Smile of Murugan: On Tamil Literature of South India: On Tamil Literature of South India
Sanskrit is considered to be older than Tamil. Sanskrit is an ancient Indo-European language that has been used for thousands of years, while Tamil is a Dravidian language that originated around the same time but is generally considered to be younger than Sanskrit.
Sanskrit is considered to be an older language than Arabic. Sanskrit is one of the oldest known languages and is the liturgical language of Hinduism, while Arabic is a Semitic language that developed later and is primarily associated with Islam.
No, Sanskrit is an ancient Indo-European language that pre-dates Tamil. Tamil is a Dravidian language that developed independently in South India. While both languages have influenced each other over the centuries, Sanskrit and Tamil have distinct origins and linguistic characteristics.
There is dispute between Sanskrit and Tamil on which one is oldest. Scholars on both sides provide facts and accounts that their language is the oldest. Hence there is no concrete answer to this question.please answer with source and be neutral while answering.http://wiki.answers.com/Which_is_older_than_Tamil_language#ixzz1rba74S1y
Age of Sanskrit and Tamil*Classical Sanskrit (defined by Panini's grammar, ca. 4th BC)*Classical Tamil (Sangam literature ca. 3rd BC or Older, defined by Tolkappiyam)From this its hard to find the exact age of both languages. But they are not related. Tamil is Dravidian language and Sanskrit is Indo-Aryan language. But it is clear that Tamil and Sanskrit has their own grammar to sustain independently unlike other Indian languages. Many scholars claim Tamil predates Sanskrit.SOURCES :* Encyclopedia Britannica (2008), "Sanskrit literature", Quote: "Two main periods in the development of the literature are discernible: the Vedic period, approximately 1500-200 BC; and, somewhat overlapping it, the classical period, approximately 500 BC-AD 1000."*Article "Panini" fromThe Columbia Encyclopedia (Sixth Edition. 2001-07) at Bartleby.com* Zvelebil, Kamil (1997), The Smile of Murugan: On Tamil Literature of South India: On Tamil Literature of South India
Sanskrit is considered to be older than Tamil. Sanskrit is an ancient Indo-European language that has been used for thousands of years, while Tamil is a Dravidian language that originated around the same time but is generally considered to be younger than Sanskrit.
Sanskrit is considered to be an older language than Arabic. Sanskrit is one of the oldest known languages and is the liturgical language of Hinduism, while Arabic is a Semitic language that developed later and is primarily associated with Islam.
No, Sanskrit is an ancient Indo-European language that pre-dates Tamil. Tamil is a Dravidian language that developed independently in South India. While both languages have influenced each other over the centuries, Sanskrit and Tamil have distinct origins and linguistic characteristics.
No. Sanskrit is older; probably the oldest.
There is dispute between Sanskrit and Tamil on which one is oldest. Scholars on both sides provide facts and accounts that their language is the oldest. Hence there is no concrete answer to this question.please answer with source and be neutral while answering.http://wiki.answers.com/Which_is_older_than_Tamil_language#ixzz1rba74S1y
sivashtakam in Sanskrit translate into Tamil
"TAMIL" is claimed as the first language of the world by scholars of Tamil. It's very old language than Sanskrit.
Age of Sanskrit and Tamil*Classical Sanskrit (defined by Panini's grammar, ca. 4th BC)*Classical Tamil (Sangam literature ca. 3rd BC or Older, defined by Tolkappiyam)From this its hard to find the exact age of both languages. But they are not related. Tamil is Dravidian language and Sanskrit is Indo-Aryan language. But it is clear that Tamil and Sanskrit has their own grammar to sustain independently unlike other Indian languages. Many scholars claim Tamil predates Sanskrit.SOURCES :* Encyclopedia Britannica (2008), "Sanskrit literature", Quote: "Two main periods in the development of the literature are discernible: the Vedic period, approximately 1500-200 BC; and, somewhat overlapping it, the classical period, approximately 500 BC-AD 1000."*Article "Panini" fromThe Columbia Encyclopedia (Sixth Edition. 2001-07) at Bartleby.com* Zvelebil, Kamil (1997), The Smile of Murugan: On Tamil Literature of South India: On Tamil Literature of South India
tamil
Sanskrit is much older than Arabic, as far as we know.
It's not possible to know which language is older because both languages are older than writing (possibly older than 10,000 BCE).
P. Thirugnanasambandhan has written: 'Sanskrit Tamil contact' -- subject(s): Influence on Tamil, Sanskrit language