I don't believe so. I can't think of any instances where 'think' would not have a receiver.
An intransitive verb does not require a direct object to complete its meaning, while a transitive verb requires a direct object to receive the action of the verb. For example, "sleep" is an intransitive verb in "I sleep," but "eat" is a transitive verb in "I eat food."
The verb "to sing" can be both transitive and intransitive depending on the context. When the verb is used without an object, it is considered intransitive (e.g., "She sings beautifully"). When the verb is followed by a direct object (e.g., "She sings a song"), it is considered transitive.
The verb "was" in this sentence is intransitive because it does not take a direct object.
Works is an intransitive verb in that example. There is no direct object.
No, "stay" can be both a transitive verb (takes an object) and an intransitive verb (does not require an object). For example, "Stay here" is intransitive, while "Stay the course" is transitive.
A INTRANSITIVE VERB IS A VERB THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE A OBJECT !
No, it is a helping verb, and those cannot be transitive or intransitive.
The verb was is intransitive.
The word "ran" is an intransitive verb. Intransitive verbs do not have a direct object, and may be followed by an adverb.
To fell a tree = transitive I fell = intransitive
Intransitive Verb.
Yes, went (past tense of go) is an intransitive verb.
The verb 'to jump' is intransitive. (A person does jump the ground, but jumps on the ground.)
In grammar, an intransitive verb does not take an object. In more technical terms, an intransitive verb has only one argument (its subject), and hence has a valency of one. For example, in English, the verbs sleep and die, are intransitive. ...
It is an intransitive verb.
no it is intransitive verb
Verb