The plural form of understanding is understandings. But this would have very little use since the common use (to mean comprehension) is uncountable. Compare this to the much greater use of the plural "misunderstandings."
-ing it changes the verb understand into the noun understanding. The 's' is making understand plural.
The plural of 'this' is 'these' and the plural of 'that' is 'those'.
The plural form of can is cans.
The plural for the noun loss is losses; the plural possessive is losses'.
The plural is a normal S plural, associates.
-ing it changes the verb understand into the noun understanding. The 's' is making understand plural.
We don't understand them.We don't understand you (feminine plural familiar and formal in Latin America; plural formal in Spain).*Las, in this case, is the dative of "a ellas", "a ustedes" (feminine). Only the context avoids confusion.
comprenez-vous (formal or plural) comprends-tu (informal and singular)
To understand is 'comprendre' in French. I am understanding is 'je comprends'.
Unfortunately, for you, my friend, there is no plural for could. To make an existing word into a plural, it must be a noun (eg. dog, desk, planet). I, myself, don' exactly understand why such a question would be asked? If you don't mind me asking, why?
"To understand" in English is comprendere in Italian. The present infinitive also translates literally as "to comprehend" in English. The pronunciation will be "kom-PREN-dey-rey" in Italian.
This is fine. Perhaps it would be slightly improved if "requirement" were plural, but it depends what the project is.
Forum, but the usual plural is forums. Fora strikes me as monumentally pretentious. What's more, I doubt if many people understand it.
Est-ce que tu me comprends (singular and informal) / Est-ce que vous me comprenez (plural or formal)
I don't completely understand the question. If you're asking about plural nouns, you can add an s to almost any word UNLESS they end in, s, x, ch, sh because if a word ends in s, x, ch, or sh you have to add es. If a word ins in z, you have to add zes. Some words change completely when they're plural. A few words are the same for plural and singular. For example, the plural of dog is dogs, the plural of dress is dresses, church, churches, wolf, wolves, mouse, mice, but the plural of sheep is sheep, the plural of deer is deer.
The noun 'reason' is a singular noun as a word for a cause, explanation, or justification for something; an argument or premise that supports a belief or conclusion.The plural noun is 'reasons'.The noun 'reason' is an uncountable (mass) noun as a word for the ability of the mind to think, understand, or form logical conclusions; common sense; sanity.
The plural of "she" is "they", so the plural of "she had" is "they had".