The first real evidence of language is difficult to pinpoint, but examples include cave paintings and ancient inscriptions dating back tens of thousands of years. These early forms of communication indicate the presence of complex symbolic thought and likely language use among early humans.
There's no real answer to your question, because we don't even know what the first language was yet! We know it was a very long time ago, and the first evidence of language dates back to cuneiform.
Yes, Bengali is a real language. It is the official language of Bangladesh and the second most spoken language in India. The language is also known as Bangla.
Korean is considered a language isolate because it has no proven genetic relationship to any other language. This classification is supported by the lack of clear connections to other language families through historical or linguistic evidence.
Spanish is a real language. People use it everyday.
My first language is English.
real Evidence
There's no real answer to your question, because we don't even know what the first language was yet! We know it was a very long time ago, and the first evidence of language dates back to cuneiform.
Reformed Egyptian is a concept or theory rather than a real language. It is a term used in the context of the Book of Mormon to describe a supposed ancient script that was used by the people described in the book. However, there is no evidence outside of the Book of Mormon to support the existence of Reformed Egyptian as a real language.
Plankalkul is the programming language that was designed by Konrad Zuse. It was the first real computer programming language used for engineering.
The "instrument" of the crime. A murder weapon is a type of evidence called "real" evidence. Physical evidence is called "demonstrative evidence."
English is real, alien language is not...
There is no way to determine this as there are no written records from that time (obviously nothing can be written without language first). Most likely one of our prehuman ancestors created the first language as all modern human populations seem to have used some kind of language as long as modern humans have existed. But the archaeological evidence is ambiguous on this matter.
What evidence suggest ghosts are real? I believe that is the evidence.
If by "real" you mean a writing system that includes a way to represent every consonant and vowel in the language, then the answer is the Greeks.
Archaeological evidence for the Hebrews goes back 3600 years, to 1600 BCE. Linguistic evidence for the existence of the Hebrew language goes back 12,000 years.
We have no evidence of what the ancient Anasazi language was like.
It is easier to deal first with Adam and Eve, as they clearly were not real. Not only is there no evidence for their existence, the scientific and historical evidence we do have is contrary to their existence.Whether Jesus was real can be broken down into two separate questions. First, did Jesus exist? Second, did Jesus perform miracles and was he the son of God?The existence of the gospels does not resolve these issues. However, most historians assume that Jesus probably did live some time around the first century CE, although there is no evidence for him. There is no reason to believe he performed miracles and no reason to believe he was the son of God.