answersLogoWhite

0

Language must be genetically innate since children can learn language at the same time. Deaf children did not learn speech hence showing that their language capacity did not depend on the teeth and vocal cords there human offsprings are born with special capacity of language.

User Avatar

Omphile Mario

Lvl 2
3y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Linguistics

What is the relationship between young deaf children who became fluent in sign language and innateness hypothesis?

The innateness hypothesis suggests that humans are born with the innate capacity for language acquisition. Young deaf children who become fluent in sign language support this hypothesis, as they demonstrate the ability to naturally acquire language through exposure to visual-manual communication without auditory input. This highlights the inherent predisposition for language development in humans, regardless of the modality of communication.


How would you adapt strategies for children where English was not their first language and to help their communication difficulties?

To adapt strategies for children with English as a second language and communication difficulties, use visuals, gestures, and simplified language to aid in understanding. Encourage the use of their native language as needed, and provide extra support and patience during communication. Consider utilizing bilingual resources and working closely with families and support services to help bridge the language barrier.


Write three factors that influence the language development in the children?

Three factors that influence language development in children are genetic predisposition, environmental exposure to language, and social interactions with caregivers and peers. Genetic factors can determine a child's language abilities, while exposure to a rich language environment and frequent interactions with others help to support and enhance their language skills.


Children learn language very quickly based on relatively limited time spent interacting with adults. This is taken as support for the nativist view of language development and is called the?

poverty of stimulus argument.


When was specific language impairment discovered?

Specific Language Impairment (SLI) was formally recognized as a distinct language disorder in the 1970s. Researchers began to study children with language difficulties who demonstrated normal intelligence and no other obvious reason for their language impairments. This has led to a better understanding of SLI and the development of interventions to support affected individuals.

Related Questions

What is the relationship between young deaf children who became fluent in sign language and innateness hypothesis?

The innateness hypothesis suggests that humans are born with the innate capacity for language acquisition. Young deaf children who become fluent in sign language support this hypothesis, as they demonstrate the ability to naturally acquire language through exposure to visual-manual communication without auditory input. This highlights the inherent predisposition for language development in humans, regardless of the modality of communication.


How do you support children's play and communication development in bilingual and multilingual settings and where children learn through an additional language?

How do you support children's play and communication development in bilingual and multilingual settings and where children learn through an additional language?


How can data not support your hypothesis?

If your hypothesis is totally incorrect then it is quite likely that the data will not support it.


Two reason why an experiment might not support a hypothesis even when the hypothesis is correct?

An experiment might not support a hypothesis even if the hypothesis is correct because if the conclusion


Why is hypothesis is discarded as a valid hypothesis?

when results from the experiments repeatedly fail to support the hypothesis.


What can scientists do if their tests do not support their hypothesis?

Amend or discard the hypothesis


What do scientist do when their data does not support their hypothesis?

Discard or change the hypothesis.


What can scientists do if their test do not support their hypothesis?

Amend or discard the hypothesis


How do you support a hypothesis?

You obtain objective evidence to support it by undertaking experiments designed to test the veracity of the hypothesis.


What should you do when your data will not support your hypothesis?

come up with new hypothesis


What happens when the data doesn't support the hypothesis?

Change or abandon your hypothesis.


Did your data support your hypothesis?

so you have to put in did it help you explain your hypothesis