a long lost interview with the author of the necklace says that he likes to imagine the necklace was lost when she was leaving the party in a hurry
In "The Necklace," Monsieur Loisel is frustrated with his wife's dissatisfaction with their modest life and her desire for wealth and luxuries. He is practical and content with their life, which causes tension between them when Madame Loisel loses the borrowed necklace. He is patient and supportive in helping his wife find a way to replace the lost necklace.
How does Mathilde Loisel's desire for wealth and social status affect her life? What role does the necklace play in the story's plot? How does the theme of deception and appearance versus reality manifest in the story? What is the significance of the story's ending and the revelation about the necklace?
When Mathilde finds out that she has lost the diamond necklace of Madame Forestier, she is in a depression. Mathilde and Monsieur Loisel then have to work for 10 years to come up with the 36,000 francs to buy a new necklace. She works as a maid to save the money and her husband does work two jobs..
In a hurry because she had lost her necklace and did not know where it was.
The conclusion based on the excerpt "The Necklace" is that material possessions alone do not determine one's happiness or social status. The story demonstrates that appearances can be deceiving and that true value lies in personal qualities and relationships.
She lost her necklace and she just wanted to go home!
Madame Loisel's friend tells her that the necklace she borrowed was a fake, not real diamonds. This revelation surprises Madame Loisel because she had spent years working to pay off a real diamond necklace that she thought she had lost.
In Guy de Maupassant's short story, "The Necklace" (1884), it is Mme. Loisel, the one who borrowed and lost the necklace, who recognizes Mme. Forestier. This meeting sets up the twist ending.
the necklace was an imimtaion, it wasnt real
The time line is a ten year period. The story begins with the necklace being borrowed and lost and ends ten years later when Mme Loisel meets Mme Forestier after the Loisel's spent ten years paying off the loan they took out to pay for the replacement necklace.
no she should have just told the lady from the beginning, because in the end the necklace was fake and she suffered more hardships for no reason.