Well, as far as I know, red wolves are no more violent than any other wolf. And all wolves are not even terribly violent. They usually only hunt sick or injured prey, because #1, it keeps their prey's population healthy, and #2, its easier to catch, obviously. Also, wolves do not attack humans unless they are defending themselves or are derived of their natural food source, which is usually caused by humans moving into the wolves land and killing their prey. So, no, red wolves are not that violent, nor is any other wolf. Yes they are carnivores, and yes, they kill to survive, but so do humans, and we don't consider ourselves really 'violent'.
no, red wolves are brownish wolves but they are not red.
No, they do not all have rabies. Because of their sometimes violent behavior they are mistaken to have rabies. Wolves are only violent when they think they are offended. They then defend themselves using force.
Some species of wolves are the gray wolves, red wolves, antic wolves and the coyote-wolf hybrid.
Red wolves to not construct any form of home.
you mean red and black wolves, and yes, they can mix.
No, but gray wolves may eat a red fox.
This question makes no sense. Rephrase it.
Arctic Wolves Timber Wolves Red Wolves Ethiopian Wolves Indian Wolves Asiatic Wolves European Wolves (probably extinct)
they halft to be red
Nope. Ethiopian wolves look more like jackals. In fact, one of their nicknames is the 'Red Jackal'.
because of humans. humans have been killing red wolves for their fur
No