A compelling thesis statement about whaling could be: "Despite its historical significance and cultural importance in certain societies, modern whaling practices pose severe threats to marine biodiversity and ecological balance, necessitating a reevaluation of whaling policies and stronger international protections for endangered whale species." This statement highlights the need for a critical examination of whaling's impact on the environment while acknowledging its cultural context.
America is against whaling. They almost put whales out of the ocean for good when they did do whaling. They wanted their blubber for oil.
Whaling isn't good at all
Commercial Whaling has been banned since 1986 by the International Whaling commission. However, scientific whaling is allowed to strict quotas.
Protesting and intervening with whaling ships
Whaling happens in oceans, not on continents.
Whaling stopped in Australia is 1979
If you mean whales, they die painfully.
Australia banned whaling primarily to protect whale populations that were severely depleted due to commercial hunting. The Australian government recognized the ecological importance of whales and their role in marine ecosystems. Additionally, international pressure and a commitment to conservation led to the implementation of strict laws against whaling. The decision reflects a broader global movement towards wildlife protection and sustainable practices.
Well scientific whaling as basically when you do scientific research on whales. This is actually one of Japans excuse for whaling but of course their lying they use it for food and oil and all that (STOP WHALING!)
Whaling goes back more then 5,000 years.
Whaling affects the population of whales, and in great numbers.