For my opoinion, being a member is better than being a leader for these reason
-leader needs lots of skills and quality in order to lead the group with good leadership.
-leaders usually must do the hardest work in the group.
-leaders must do everything correct and planed in order to make no mistakes. If the leader makes a small mistake, the whole group might lapse with the leader because the group depends on the leader.
The quote "innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower" suggests that true leadership is characterized by the ability to create and implement new ideas, rather than simply adhering to established norms or practices. Leaders drive progress and inspire others by embracing change and taking risks, while followers often remain within the boundaries of existing frameworks. This distinction highlights the importance of creativity and forward-thinking in achieving success and making a lasting impact. Ultimately, innovation is what propels leaders ahead of others in any field.
Prepare, a little pesticide is better than losing your entire crop. A $20 flu shot is better than being hospitalized by severe flu..... Safely placing the candle away from flammable is better than rebuilding your burnt down house.
A leader doesn't throw his weight around, respects other members of the group, is courageous, is bold when they have to be but never does anything that might risk anyone but his own life, does his part, doesn't act like he is better than everyone else, knows his limits, and stands up for other members of the group! That is what makes a leader! Hope it helps :D
Because he saw an oppertunity to own a company while new computer were being built and he thought "I can do better than that."
Women have the ability to multi task as well as work collaboratively in groups. Women can grab attention and can manage people well. On the other hand, men generally take leadership to the extreme and turn into being the 'dominator.' In a nutshell, women lead better than men in some areas, and men lead better than women in some areas.
That depends on what role you are more comfortable with.
This question calls for an opinion, not an example sentence.
Being a good reader can certainly enhance one's ability to understand and follow written instructions or guidelines effectively. However, being a good follower also involves traits such as commitment, accountability, and teamwork that extend beyond just reading skills. It's important to consider the context and requirements of a specific situation when determining the relationship between being a good reader and a good follower.
There are advantages and disadvantages to being a leader OR a follower! A follower can:Defer to someone else's judgment, opinion, or experience.Hide behind someone else's decisions, so the leader might get in more trouble than the follower.Learn by watching the leader(s).Make fewer waves and have less conflicts with others.Opt out of following to become a leader.I would rather be a follower if:We were walking through snake infested waters.We were wading through a swamp with alligators around.We encountered an angry bull elephant.We were walking behind horses in a parade (since horses excrete whenever and wherever they please).You opened a closet door where a man with a hatchet was hiding.I wanted to learn from watching how a leader handles situations.I was alive following the coffin of a leader....in which case, I might become a leader since you died.
no
I really think he is becaus he is an overall better player I disagree , i think ronaldo is alot better than beckham but i dont think he could ever be a leader !
A sequacious person would tend to be a follower rather than a leader. This term describes someone who is overly eager to follow others or adopt their ideas without critical thinking. Such individuals may lack the initiative or confidence to lead, preferring to align themselves with established opinions or trends.
Swami Vivekananda once told 'Leader cannot be made, they are born'. It is wiser to be follower rather than trying in vain to be a leader, without possessing the in born qualities. However, under democratic set up, even a party supporter can rise to the level of becoming minister even president.
Advantage:You have less responsibility. Disadvantage: You do not become who you are.You have to follow the leaders' decision rather than yours
The Norman leader William was much better equipped than the Anglo leader Harold. William had a good mixture of infantry and cavalry.
One thing about presidential government that is better than parliamentary government is how the leader is chosen. In a presidential government the people choose their leader. This gives the people more say in their country and who governs it.
A scenester is someone who does whatever is cool to fit in. some people call them trendy or scene kids. a scenester is more of a follower than a leader. Not true actually, I'm a scene girl, and I'm totally not a follower, I'm not anything, I just do whatever, and I do not do whatever is cool to fit in, I do my own thing. I'm my own person.