A major advantage of group decision making is that more information is brought to bear identifying and evaluating alternatives. The more diverse the group's composition, the more likely it is that creative ideas will be forthcoming.
Advantages
1. Diversity: Varied cultures, age groups, gender, etc all add to the diversity of group which gives us varied perspectives and enhances the kind of ideas the group can come up with.
2. Varied experiences: There are difference in fields of experience and amount of experience and there differences in the life experiences and the kind of experiences people have had even with the same problem. This pool of experience can be a great advantage.
3. Enhanced memory for facts: An individual may forget a particular piece of information, but as there are a number of people involved here, there is the combined memory of all members to recollect data.
4. Greater Acceptability of decisions: As everyone has made some contribution to the decision, people tend to be more accepting of the decision. Also those who may not have contributed still support it as "the group" has come to this decision.
5. Error detection: When there are many people working together, mistakes and errors that may have accidentally gone unnoticed and had serious consequences are spotted by other team members.
6. collective understanding: The members together come to a decision after much deliberation and discussions and so everyone has a better understanding of the course of action to be followed.
7. Less influence of bias: Individual biases can be challenged and individuals may have to recognize and eliminate them.
8. more creative solutions: With so many people involved, more creative and innovative solutions to problems may emerge than an individual may have been able to develop.
9. shared responsibility: There are a number of people involved, so no one person has to shoulder the burden of work or of single-handedly making a decision.
10. motivational effect: The group decision making may even have a motivational effect on the team if the team is a successful one.
11. simplifies complex decisions: Many complex decisions can be made by the group decision making process which an individual may not have been able to tackle.
12. More information and knowledge are available
13. More alternatives are likely to be generated
14. More acceptance of the final decisions is likely
15. Enhanced communication of decision making may result
16. Better decision generally emerge
There are a number of advantages of authoritarian leadership. Some of them include decision making is faster, there is flow of work process, offers close oversight and total control among others.
DSS (Decision Support System) and GDSS (Group Decision Support System) are designed specifically to facilitate and enhance decision-making processes. ESS (Executive Support System) also supports decision-making but focuses more on high-level strategic decisions for executives. Therefore, the option "All of the above" is incorrect, as each system mentioned does support decision-making in some capacity.
There are three major approaches to strategic decision making in business. The first is intuition, or making decisions on a hunch or with your 'gut'. The second is a small group process, where 3-4 people combine to hash out a decision. The last approach is through analytics. That is the process of letting data and research dictate a choice.
There are a number of steps involved in decision making process. Some of the key steps include gathering relevant information, analysis and evaluation of the information gathered and comparing the various options available before making a decision.
by working hard to get better money and to get some where in life
discuss some strengths and weaknesses of group decision-making
Loose decision making
Do you do dysfunctional decision making or someone else? Either way it sounds like you could benefit from contacting CWIIL GROUP and receive some information and aid on management skills, decision making skills, decision making process etc. Get their contacts by visiting their websites. That would be a smart decision ;)
Anyone who holds some level of power in group decision-making but is not accountable directly to the group itself.
There are a number of advantages of authoritarian leadership. Some of them include decision making is faster, there is flow of work process, offers close oversight and total control among others.
Some advantages of a tribal system include a strong sense of community and support network, clear social hierarchy and roles, efficient decision-making processes, and preservation of cultural traditions and values.
DSS (Decision Support System) and GDSS (Group Decision Support System) are designed specifically to facilitate and enhance decision-making processes. ESS (Executive Support System) also supports decision-making but focuses more on high-level strategic decisions for executives. Therefore, the option "All of the above" is incorrect, as each system mentioned does support decision-making in some capacity.
There are some advantages of having sole proprietorship for a business, such as, control over decision making, being your own boss, less tax payments and the whole experience is typically less formal.
There are three major approaches to strategic decision making in business. The first is intuition, or making decisions on a hunch or with your 'gut'. The second is a small group process, where 3-4 people combine to hash out a decision. The last approach is through analytics. That is the process of letting data and research dictate a choice.
Robert Morris Smith has written: 'Some aspects of decision-making in a group of six primary schools'
some people feel comforming to group norms results in a loss of personal identity and independent decision making
CU is not responsible for decision making, It is only responsible for how fast the computation is performed. For decision making need logical operations and for that we've some software program which perform logical operations which does decision making.