It is the opposite of reactive, which is waiting for failure. Proactive is the changing of parts before they fail. As an example, on a scheduled down day, major components are checked for wear. Depending on the process, this can be very time consuming, but the efficiency and the reliability of the process is greatly increased. Although not a foolproof solution, failures can still occur but instead of major components failing with a greater or longer downtime to repair the problem, smaller parts may fail but can be replaced much quicker. Some parts cannot be checked for they are what is called 'black boxes', which will operate for so long before they fail, and because they are less expensive you wait for them to fail and then react to the failure. Another example of proactive planning: lighting studies done for lighting efficiency for larger factories or buildings which suggest replacing lamps at eighty percent spent or used before they expire. Proactive planning is the concept of planning AHEAD of the actual event, to be prepared for it (whatever it is). By being proactive you avoid being over-run by the event, and have plans and procedures in place to cope with it (whatever it is). Emergency organizations, like police and EMS have plans for future events like riots, floods or earthquakes, you should, too. In business, it is always good to be prepared. I hate the term "proactive planning." It's redundant -- a pleonasm, if you will. One cannot reactively plan. You can be reactive or you can be proactive. You can wait for stuff to happen and then react, or you can anticipate stuff and plan for its occurrence. Planning, by its very nature, is proactive. It doesn't need the attributive proactive. (Now I'm being redundant.) For another (longer) explanation of Proactive Planning click...
http://www.wikihow.com/Be-Proactive
PLANNING IN ADVANCE TO DEAL WITH UNEXPECTED PROBLEMS
Contingency planning is where organisations prepare contingency plans in recognition of the fact that things do go wrong from time to time, so this is prepared BEFORE A CRISIS. It refers to being proactive, what-if's. Crisis Management involves identifying a crisis and planning a response, AFTER a crisis has occurred.
Strategic planning involves setting long-term goals and determining the best pathways to achieve them, focusing on the organization's vision and mission. In contrast, contingency planning prepares for unexpected events or crises by developing alternative courses of action to mitigate risks and ensure continuity. While strategic planning is proactive and goal-oriented, contingency planning is reactive and focused on risk management. Both are essential for organizational resilience but serve distinct purposes.
Proactive decision making refers to the process of anticipating potential challenges and opportunities before they arise, allowing individuals or organizations to take initiative and act accordingly. It involves gathering information, analyzing trends, and planning strategically to influence outcomes positively. By being proactive, decision-makers can mitigate risks and seize favorable opportunities, rather than simply reacting to events as they occur. This approach fosters a more effective and resilient decision-making framework.
Organizations conduct planning to establish clear goals and objectives, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively to achieve these targets. It helps in anticipating potential challenges and opportunities, enabling proactive decision-making. Additionally, planning fosters alignment and coordination among team members, promoting efficiency and enhancing overall organizational performance. Ultimately, it provides a roadmap for success and adaptability in a dynamic environment.
why is it important to be proactive?
PLANNING IN ADVANCE TO DEAL WITH UNEXPECTED PROBLEMS
Proactive means taking action in advance to prevent issues. Skipping the first step in being proactive could lead to overlooking potential problems or opportunities for improvement, compromising the effectiveness of your proactive approach. It's important to be thorough and comprehensive in your proactive planning and actions.
The difference between proactive and reactive has to do with when the action takes place. Proactive means a preventative action occurs to stop something from happening, reactive means something is done as a response to something that has happened.
THERE ARE MANY WAYS TO START BECOMING MORE PROACTIVE. ONE WAY TO START IS BY PLANNING YOUR ACTIVITES AHEAD OF TIME AND STOP WAITING UNTIL THE LAST MINUTE.
"Planning is looking ahead" because is done for future and done so by keep future situations in mind to be proactive in future rather reactive.
Proactive approach involves anticipating and planning for future needs and potential issues. Skipping the first step could mean reacting to situations as they occur rather than taking a proactive stance. This may lead to more challenges and setbacks in the long run.
What is an ineffectual way of deploying this business plan? Give some examples of what not to do in this situation
Reactive planning is the process whereby future action is dictated as a response to whatever has already, or is now, occurring--- it is "reflex" or "knee-jerk" in nature. The opposite side of the coin is proactive planning, which sets in motion actions as a function of what is anticipated or probable; it is preemptive in nature. jb
Proactive planning feedback mechanisms are systems put in place to gather input and recommendations from stakeholders before decisions are made. This can include surveys, focus groups, or regular check-ins to ensure that planning efforts align with the needs and preferences of those involved. These mechanisms help identify potential issues early on and improve the overall effectiveness of the planning process.
what are the advantages of proactive purchasing
"Proactive" is an adjective.