Yes, the disciples were scholars as they learned from Jesus, directly and later had the Holy Spirit in them to guide them in the teachings of Christ.
Additional Answer:
The Bible mentions Gamaliel by name and by extension, the Apostle Paul, his student. Jesus spoke to the scholars in the Synagogue in Jerusalem at the Passover of His 12th birthday. It also mentions scholar(s) as a whole:
Acts 22:3New King James Version (NKJV)3 "I am indeed a Jew, born in Tarsus of Cilicia, but brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, taught according to the strictness of our fathers' law, and was zealous toward God as you all are today.
I saw it in the tv show " Mysteries of the Bible" that after they wrote the bible he had his scholars killed and burned all fifty of them. Is that true ?
The KJV Bible is a combined effort by about 50 scholars.
No discoveries in Mesopotamia prove that the Bible is an accurate historical book, otherwise modern scholars would have to regard it as such. Most modern scholars accept accounts in the Bible as historically true only so far as they are confirmed by extra-biblical sources. They see the Bible as true in parts, but not in total.
Jewish scholars in Alexandria translated the Hebrew Bible into Greek, a version known as the Septuagint.
The first person in Bible scripture noted to become intoxicated was Noah: Genesis 9:21...and he (Noah) drank of the wine, and was drunken...
The Bible says that the Hebrews spent 430 years in Egypt. Scholars long ago noted that there is little or no Egyptian influence in the Hebrew language. The closest language to the early Hebrew language was the Canaanite language.
I saw it in the tv show " Mysteries of the Bible" that after they wrote the bible he had his scholars killed and burned all fifty of them. Is that true ?
I have studied the Bible for more than 30years and will be happy to answer any question. Kind regards
No. King James didn't translate any bible. He hired biblical scholars to translate the bible. The KJV wasn't the first English bible version. The Bishops bible, the Geneva bible, among others were translated first.
Scholars who study scriptures for the purpose of explaining and, if necessary, defending religion are known as theologians. Scholars who study scriptures in order to understand the origins and meanings of those scriptures are simply known as biblical scholars.
There is no direct evidence of hidden astrology in the Bible. While some scholars have suggested possible astrological references in certain passages, the overall consensus is that astrology is not a prominent theme in the Bible.
The KJV Bible is a combined effort by about 50 scholars.
A:The Books of Proverbas and Ecclesiastes are traditionally attributed to King Solomon, as well as several psalms, but scholars say that this was not the case. Solomon did not write any books of The Bible.
Scholars are often termed scribes and recorders in the Bible, and appear 68 and 9 times respectively.Additional Answer:By name, here is one:Acts 5:34New King James Version (NKJV) 34 Then one in the council stood up, a Pharisee named Gamaliel, a teacher of the law held in respect by all the people, and commanded them to put the apostles outside for a little while.Note: The Apostles and many disciples, who learned directly from Jesus and were filled with the Holy Spirit of God (aka Christ) at Pentecost, where 'scholars' in the truest sense and the truths of God were fully revealed to most (letter and spiritual).
During the translation process of the King James Bible, King James did not make any changes himself. He appointed a group of scholars to translate the text from the original languages into English. The scholars aimed to create a more accurate and readable version of the Bible, rather than making significant changes to the content.
I'm not aware of any place in the Bible where the number of a centurion's command is noted. I could be wrong on this. If it is there, it would have to be someplace in the New Testament. The Bible is a religious Book, not a military manual.
No, it is a Celtic name that was not known in Bible times. Scholars are not sure what it means, but one suggestion is "stone".