I know that Jesus and the bible feels that any kind of astrology is wrong.
No. In fact there are piles upon piles of evidence to the contrary. Astrology is bogus, save your money.
There is limited solid evidence of any kind in the bible, certainly none of aliens. However, there are certain events recorded in the Bible that could be interpreted as describing UFOs and/or aliens.
Because it is not scientific. There is no science behind. There is absolutely no scientific evidence in any of the things it is supposed to do.
There is no extra-biblical evidence that Jesus ascended to heaven.
There is no evidence to suggest that Judas Iscariot was a Scorpio. Astrology was not prevalent in the time of Judas, and his zodiac sign is not mentioned in any historical accounts.
Yes
Biblical tradition lists Thaddeus as one of the seventy apostles of Christ. There is no historical evidence that he wrote any of the books in the KJV bible.
The earliest records of any form of astrology are those of the Babylonians, in or around the second millennium BCE. Some claim the Sumerians also had it a millennium earlier, but there is no evidence to support this.
Yes, there is evidence for some things and some events described in the Bible, but no evidence for many other things and events. There is no evidence for the creation stories, Noahs Flood, Abraham, Isaac or Jacob, nor of the Exodus from Egypt or the military conquest of Canaan. There is no evidence outside the Bible for the United Monarchy of Saul, David and Solomon, but there may be circumstantial evidence that David once lived, or at least that the people believed he once had. There is no evidence for prophets like Elijah and Elisha, but there is evidence for the northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah. There is evidence for the Babylonian Exile and the Return to Jerusalem under Persian rule. There is no evidence that the Books of Daniel and Esther were more than novelistic fiction. There is no evidence outside the Bible for any of the miracles performed by Jesus, or even his crucifixion and resurrection. In fact, there is no real evidence that Jesus of Nazareth even existed, although he may well have done so.
There is no evidence, so it is not a theory. It doesn't even make any sense. It's just trying to make up an excuse for the bible by sounding sciencey
The Bible is not infallible. There is no evidence that it is Gods word. But there is evidence that it is a Hebrew idea (thoughtform). The Bible is considered to be Judeo Christian, although it has influences from Egypt, Persia, Greece, maybe even China and India.It might be better to say that it is a God's word. There's no evidence of God himself ever existing, so there will not be any evidence that he decided what went into the bible. That's why most Christians will just tell you they have faith. See the related link on the left for a Christian perspective on the question. If the Bible is really God's word, then all it's Prophecies & Promises will be fulfilled, and the events will not contradict, agree? See link on left on Prophecy & Promises, History & Science and Absurdities in the Bible.