501 = DI
501=DI
Yes the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N but there was no need to use it because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self explanatory. For example to write out 501 we need to include a zero to represent its real value but the equivalent of 501 in Roman numerals is DI which does not require a zero symbol.
64 in Roman numerals is LXIV
Roman numerals don't have a 0 symbol and so it is an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
In Roman numerals, twelve is represented by the symbol "XII".
501=DI
Yes the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N but there was no need to use it because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self explanatory. For example to write out 501 we need to include a zero to represent its real value but the equivalent of 501 in Roman numerals is DI which does not require a zero symbol.
64 in Roman numerals is LXIV
Roman numerals do not have any symbol occurring consecutively more than three (or sometimes four) times. A number such as 9000 would be written as the symbol IX (the Roman numeral for 9) with a horizontal line over the top. The horizontal line indicates the number is multiplied by ten thousand.The remainder of the number would be written as 501 is normally written: DI
Roman numerals don't have a 0 symbol and so it is an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
In Roman numerals, twelve is represented by the symbol "XII".
The lack of a zero symbol creates no problems with Roman numerals.
Zero cannot be represented in Roman Numerals.
The Roman numerals for 27 are XXVII. In Roman numerals, the symbol "X" represents 10, the symbol "V" represents 5, and the symbol "I" represents 1. Therefore, "XX" represents 20, "V" represents 5, and "II" represents 2, which when combined, gives us 27.
2009 in Roman numerals is MMIX.
Roman numerals do not include a symbol for zero, so zero cannot be rendered in Roman numberals.
In Roman numerals the symbol D represents the number 500.