None, since the hypothesis which proposed such a history is assumed to be false in terms of the pillars upon which it rests, in terms of its main premises.
Deuteronomy and the history surrounding it belongs in the Exodus period, as written, around 1400 BC. The Deuteronomist, for whom there has never been any actual evidence, although that person was such a great writer never existed.
A:Biblical scholars tend to group the books of Joshua, Judges, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings and 2 Kings together under the name, Deuteronomic History. These books form a well-integrated set that scholars regard as originating from the same source late in the Judahite monarchical period, but extensively redacted later. Second Kings is the last book in the Deuteronomic History and is followed by 1 Chronicles.
AnswerAlmost all histories are subjective, particularly histories written in ancient times before modern standards of historical scholarship were defined. Within this limitation, the Deuteronomic History (Joshua, Judges, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings and 2 Kings), written in the time of King Josiah, provides one view of the history of Israel and Judah. The Book of Chronicles, written after the Babylonian Exile, provides a noticeably different of the history of Israel and Judah, but was clearly based on information taken from the Deuteronomic History.
Integers were first used before the AD period in history. It is believed they were originated from Latin origins and developed after that time.
A:The principal biblical history of early Israel and Judah is the Deuteronomic History, consisting of the Books of Joshua, Judges, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings and 2 Kings. Although traditionally regarded as having been written over a period of many centuries by different authors in different times and even different cultures, they actually form a well-integrated set of works that are, in large part, by the same anonymous author. This is the same author that also wrote the Book of Deuteronomy and the author is therefore now known as the Deuteronomist.Another history that parallels this and may have been intended to replace it is found in 1 Chronicles and 2 Chronicles. The books of Chronicles, also by an anonymous author now known as the Chronicler, differ in some significant respects from the Deuteronomic History, particularly in the role of King David.Carol Meyers (The Oxford History of the Biblical World, Kinship and Kingship: The Early monarchy) says that the Book of Ruth seems to provide evidence about the premonarchic period, but much suggests that the book comes from a later period: several features of its language, the explanation in 4:7 of the custom of the redemption around which the end of the story revolves, and the denouement that traces the roots of the Davidic monarchy. She says the book of Ruth may tell us nothing about the era of the judges beyond what an Israelite storyteller of a later period knew of it, although even that is worthwhile information. Who this storyteller was remains a mystery.Carol A. Redmount (The Oxford History of the Biblical World, Bitter lives) says that the biblical Exodus account was never intended to function or to be understood as history in the present-day sense of the word.
1) The four traditions are Yahwist, Elohist, Deuteronomic and Priestly.
A:The term 'Deuteronomic History' refers to the Books of Joshua, Judges, 1 and 2 Samuel and 1 and 2 Kings. These form an integrated block of text covering the period from the conquest of Canaan through to the end of the monarchy. Unlike the Pentateuch, the Deuteronomic History does not really attempt to answer questions so much as attempt to provide a history of the Jews, largely using a Judahite perspective and more or less asserting the existence of a Yahweh-only faith throughout the period covered. The Books of 1 and 2 Chronicles were written after the Babylonian Exile, based on the Deuteronomic History but with changes to suit the political and theological realities of the time.
The Deuteronomist portrayed David and Solomon in a very positive light, as they were believed to be the ancestors of the royal family of Judah, right down to his own time. In fact, the Chronicler, apparently rewriting the Deuteronomic History, downplayed the enthusiasm of the Deuteronomic History a little.
1 Kings and 2 Kings are part of the series now known as the Deuteronomic History and are moderately reliable in their history. The Deuteronomic History consists of Joshua, Judges, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings and 2 Kings.1 Chronicles and 2 Chronicles are also considered history books, but are possibly less reliable than the Deuteronomic History on which they are based, because that original source was amended without reliance on any other known source.
Sengoku period of Japanese history .
A " period in history" means that the time time is prolonged. I t is a long time. I know this because I learned it at school
A:Biblical scholars tend to group the books of Joshua, Judges, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings and 2 Kings together under the name, Deuteronomic History. These books form a well-integrated set that scholars regard as originating from the same source late in the Judahite monarchical period, but extensively redacted later. Second Kings is the last book in the Deuteronomic History and is followed by 1 Chronicles.
The Book of Chronicles is another history that more or less parallels the rather earlier Deuteronomic history, but presents the priestly point of view. Scholars say that it was written shortly after the Babylonian Exile, using the Deuteronomic history for its source. Chronicles attempts to resolve some of the inconsistencies found in the Deuteronomic history and introduces new theological concepts by placing them in a pre-Exilic context. For example, the notion of Satan entered Judaism during the Exile, and 1 Chronicles 21:1 says, "And Satan stood up against Israel and provoked David to number Israel." Because Kings (part of the Deuteronomic history) was written before the Exile, the corresponding passage contains no mention of Satan. The anonymous author of Chronicles is now referred to as the Chronicler.
celts
1 Kings is in the Old Testament. It is part of what is now known as the Deuteronomic History.
AnswerAlmost all histories are subjective, particularly histories written in ancient times before modern standards of historical scholarship were defined. Within this limitation, the Deuteronomic History (Joshua, Judges, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings and 2 Kings), written in the time of King Josiah, provides one view of the history of Israel and Judah. The Book of Chronicles, written after the Babylonian Exile, provides a noticeably different of the history of Israel and Judah, but was clearly based on information taken from the Deuteronomic History.
Another answer from our community:The Deuteronomic History is named by the developers of the documentary hypothesis in the 19th century to refer to the history also written by the author of Deuteronomy. They gave this history a separate name because they believed it represented a different perspective of a different author who wrote much later than the time of Moses.This is connected with their second major presupposition, that of an evolutionary development of the religion of Israel from primitive polytheism (many gods) to Henotheism (many gods, with one chief god) to Monotheism (one God). Josiah's reform was intended to bring the 'triumph of Monotheism' by attributing its authority to antiquity, whereas it was the invention of a much alter age.Thus although the theory is elaborate it has no supporting evidence except its own internal circular reasoning. There never was any evidence of any kind for the theory as postulated, except in the minds of its creators and proponents. No documents of any kind exist which support the proposed deuteronomic history or the existence of the alleged author. No corroborating historical detail external to the Bible itself, supports it. The internal witness of the Bible itself, also thoroughly refutes this history.Thus there never was such a thing as the Deuteronomic History as postulated by the documentary theorists. Nor was there a necessity to create such a history. I believe the evidence points toward a single author in the time-frame suggested by the text itself, around 1400 BC, that person being Moses.
It was the Precambrian time period.