Even the most conservative theologians acknowledge that Mark never met Jesus in person, so could not have learnt of the gospel from him. Papias, bishop of Hieropolis in Asia Minor (ca.130), named Mark as the author of the (previously anonymous) gospel and the 'interpreter' of Peter, presumably as if Mark had written from Peter's memory and notes as his secretary (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, 3.39).
There is no real reason to rely on Papias' asumptions, which means that we do not even know the true identity of the Gospel's author, and Raymond E. Brown (An Introduction to the New Testament) assumes that Mark seems to depend on traditions (and perhaps already shaped sources) received in Greek. Parallels between Mark's Gospel and Pauls epistles to the Romans and the Corinthians suggest that these sources might have been no more than these brief references in the epistles, fleshed out by 'Mark' himself, to create the story of Jesus of Nazareth.
The book that comes after Mark in the Bible is Luke.
No, Mark wrote the book of Mark.
there are sixteen chapter in the book of Mark
According to my bible, there are 16 chapters in the book of Mark.
The 1st book of the bible is matthaw 2nd Mark 3rd Luke 4th John
The book that comes after Mark in the Bible is Luke.
No, Mark wrote the book of Mark.
there are sixteen chapter in the book of Mark
The book of Mark has 16 chapters.
Mark wrote the 'Gospel according to Mark'.
There is no such thing as a baptist Bookmark, just use a book mark
According to my bible, there are 16 chapters in the book of Mark.
The 1st book of the bible is matthaw 2nd Mark 3rd Luke 4th John
narrative
mark is the answer.
No he did not.
No. The book of Mark (The Gospel according to Mark) is in the New Testament of the Bible. Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints use both the Bible and the Book of Mormon as scripture, so they still believe in the Book of Mark.