0
What else can I help you with?
What is wrong with a clocks roman numerals?
On some clocks they use IIII instead of IV and VIIII instead of IX. They are not really wrong, just not the common way. See the link below for an excellent answer to the question.
What is the roman numeral 4 for clocks?
IIII isn't the technical one but it's what most clocks use. the real one is IV
Why do some clock faces use IIII instead of IV for four in roman numerals?
The Romans used IIII to represent the number 4 but later the symbol IV was used so that it would comply with the general rules, which stated that no symbols should be repeated more than three times. However when clock and watches were first developed Roman numerals were still in regular use and many people prefered the older method of writing 4, so IIII was still used, particularly on older clocks, watches and sundials.
What is IIII Roman Numerals?
That is not a roman numeral.I = 1II = 2III = 3IV = 4V = 5VI = 6VII = 7VIII = 8IX = 9X= 10Another response:Actually, it was a Roman numeral. The Romans were superstitious, and since "IV" were the first two letters of Jupiter's name, they used IIII for four. That's why old fashioned clocks show IIII instead of IV.Another response:But now IV is used.Another response:I'm sorry, but I'd disagree. IV may well be used, but if one is using Roman numerals, one should use them as the Roman's did. Fancy clocks made today still do it the Roman way, with the IIII. If one wishes to be modern, or logically consistent, then one still doesn't use "IV", but rather "4".
Is the roman numeral llll still used on modern clocks?
No, the Roman numeral for 4 is IV, not llll. The use of llll is a common mistake, but traditional Roman numeral representations on clocks and other time-related devices use IV instead of llll for the numeral 4.
What is wrong with a clocks roman numerals?
On some clocks they use IIII instead of IV and VIIII instead of IX. They are not really wrong, just not the common way. See the link below for an excellent answer to the question.
What is the roman numeral 4 for clocks?
IIII isn't the technical one but it's what most clocks use. the real one is IV
How do you make 4's in roman numerals?
The most usual way (these days) is IV. However the romans often used IIII and you will still see IIII on clocks that use roman numerals.
Why do some clock faces use IIII instead of IV for four in roman numerals?
The Romans used IIII to represent the number 4 but later the symbol IV was used so that it would comply with the general rules, which stated that no symbols should be repeated more than three times. However when clock and watches were first developed Roman numerals were still in regular use and many people prefered the older method of writing 4, so IIII was still used, particularly on older clocks, watches and sundials.
What is IIII Roman Numerals?
That is not a roman numeral.I = 1II = 2III = 3IV = 4V = 5VI = 6VII = 7VIII = 8IX = 9X= 10Another response:Actually, it was a Roman numeral. The Romans were superstitious, and since "IV" were the first two letters of Jupiter's name, they used IIII for four. That's why old fashioned clocks show IIII instead of IV.Another response:But now IV is used.Another response:I'm sorry, but I'd disagree. IV may well be used, but if one is using Roman numerals, one should use them as the Roman's did. Fancy clocks made today still do it the Roman way, with the IIII. If one wishes to be modern, or logically consistent, then one still doesn't use "IV", but rather "4".
Is the roman numeral llll still used on modern clocks?
No, the Roman numeral for 4 is IV, not llll. The use of llll is a common mistake, but traditional Roman numeral representations on clocks and other time-related devices use IV instead of llll for the numeral 4.
Why do some watches using Roman numerals choose to use IIII for the number four rather than the correct IV?
While IV can be seen as a simplification of IIII, one reason that IIII is used instead of IV is - if you look at the watch symmetrically - with a line down the center - VIII and IIII appear symmetrical to each other and thus IIII is seen as being more aesthetically pleasing than IV. Legend has it that the Romans themselves would have used IIII instead of IV because the letters IV were also in the name of one of their Gods. This is probably apocryphal since subtractive notation was introduced in the Middle Ages, long after the fall of the Roman Empire.
What is wrong with most correctly constructed Roman numeral clocks?
Some Roman numeral clocks use IIII to represent 4, which is how most Romans would have written it. However, in order to comply with the rule that no numeral should be writen more than three times in succession the number 4 is now more correctly written as IV.
Do clocks use magnetism?
Some clocks, especially those with mechanical movements, may use magnetism in their design to regulate or control the timekeeping mechanism. For example, some clocks may use a magnetic balance wheel or electromagnetic coils to help keep time accurately. However, quartz clocks and digital clocks typically do not rely on magnetism for their operation.
How do people use Weather Clocks?
Many people use weather clocks in various ways. These include with thermometers, and even some smart phone applications have weather clocks available.
Why do some clocks use llll for 4 instead of lV?
It goes right back to the Roman times when the ancient Romans would never ever use IV for four for fear of offending their greatest of Gods whose name was Jupiter which in the Latin language begins with IV thus it would seem that it would reduce their God to a number and not a name and so IIII was always used which has the identical value of IV meaning 5-1 = 4
Why do grandfather clocks use roman numeral 1111 for 4?
Before modern times it was common to use IIII as 4 in roman numerals. Originally IV represented the Roman god Jupiter, in latin IVPPITER. The Ancient Romans started using the short handed method we know today, subtractive notation, somewhere in the middle ages. Going back to the question of why do they use it on grandfather clocks. Some have said it is for symmatry, some stories said it made more sense to those in England who made them, others sources say they didnt find it appropriate to use the symbol of a roman god, and finally I have read it is because Louis XIV who was king of France preferred the older use. Regardless of reasoning it is said on some grandfather clock sites that the IIII is not incorrect or a mistake, but none of them tell the story of why.
