While IV can be seen as a simplification of IIII, one reason that IIII is used instead of IV is - if you look at the watch symmetrically - with a line down the center - VIII and IIII appear symmetrical to each other and thus IIII is seen as being more aesthetically pleasing than IV.
Legend has it that the Romans themselves would have used IIII instead of IV because the letters IV were also in the name of one of their Gods. This is probably apocryphal since subtractive notation was introduced in the Middle Ages, long after the fall of the Roman Empire.
The correct way to write 1209 in Roman Numerals is MCCIX.
The number one is I in roman numerals.
I believe the correct answer would be 88. It is represented by LXXXVIII.
The number 1999 in Roman numerals is MCMXCIX
The number 638 in Roman numerals is DCXXXVIII
"Maurice Lacroix Watches can be found at a number of stores. When it comes to online retailers, Amazon has a number of different Lacroix watches to choose from."
The correct way to write 1209 in Roman Numerals is MCCIX.
The number one is I in roman numerals.
The number 200 is already in numerals
I believe the correct answer would be 88. It is represented by LXXXVIII.
The number 1999 in Roman numerals is MCMXCIX
The number 638 in Roman numerals is DCXXXVIII
The number 951 in Roman numerals is CMLI
The number 49 in Roman numerals is XLIX and the number 99 in Roman numerals is XCIX
In Roman numerals, mxiv does not represent a valid number. The letter "m" represents 1000, "x" represents 10, and "iv" represents 4. However, the combination mxiv does not adhere to the subtractive notation rule of Roman numerals. The correct representation of 1014 in Roman numerals is MXIV.
A does not have an equivalent in Roman numerals.
The number 2 in Roman numerals is written as "II".